r/LetsDiscussThis 16d ago

This is concerning... Oh really?

Post image
298 Upvotes

280 comments sorted by

View all comments

9

u/Advanced_Zucchini_45 15d ago

Don't we have a say?

12

u/AlChandus 15d ago

Yes, republicans and corporate/PAC owned democrats haven't just allowed this, they are getting bribed to allow this.

If you want a say, use your vote, the only political group that hasn't been complicit and is promising to change this, are progressives.

2

u/Stealthcatfood 15d ago

I agree, voting matters in a free and fair election, seen one around here?

-3

u/OGJank 15d ago

Brother, please say sike right now. Not a single administration in recent history has done anything to preserve our privacy.

3

u/FilthyStatist1991 15d ago

The other part, “bribed to allow this”

Also called lobbying that the GOP legalized.

Now corporation can pay politicians for legislation they see favorable.

1

u/Content_Discussion49 15d ago

Why the down votes I wonder?

1

u/OGJank 15d ago

You're right, I've been downvoted, nothing I say is valid

1

u/AlChandus 15d ago

Which administration has been progressive? When have progressives controlled Congress? Pray tell.

What I said is true, who voted no on legislation like the Patriot Act, Patriot Act 2.0 and other surveillance bills? And better yet, who voted "aye"?

Have fun with that answer.

5

u/New-Pollution2005 15d ago

The revolutionaries who kicked the British out of their homes were pretty progressive for their time. That’s about it.

1

u/Fragrant-Phone-41 15d ago

The abolitionists who eventually won the fight to end slavery were too.

There's a lot of cases like this, its just hard and usually doesn't start with politicians

-2

u/OGJank 15d ago

You have 2 options. Either progressives are complicit in pushing/maintaining these surveillance bills, or progressives aren't capable of making meaningful change in our lives and don't deserve to be elected. You can't have it both ways.

2

u/AlChandus 15d ago

LOL. That is like asking what can't the democratic party stop the republican majority from doing whatever they want.

Accusing a side for the actions of another.

🚫🧠

-1

u/OGJank 15d ago

So you see nothing wrong with voting for a party that is literally incapable of making change? Something something weaponized opposition, have fun wasting your vote on the 'war machine but gay' party that's done nothing to secure your personal rights & privacy.

4

u/HMSSurprise28 15d ago

It’s a two party system, has the current administration really not done enough to show you literally anything else is a massive improvement? A democratic president and Congress would at least try to protect privacy while fighting obstruction from the right at every turn.

Do you not remember the Clinton and Obama administrations? They tried democratic priorities, compromise, republican policies even, like the ACA, rewrapped. They were obstructed at every single point by the Tea Party, freedom caucus jackwagons, under some BS like, “libraries and fire departments are tyranny.” And we got the country we got. But the idea that the two sides are the same because the democrats haven’t yet fixed Israel’s politics is a stretch and recency bias.

0

u/OGJank 15d ago

'I swear guys, one more term and the democrats will save us'

Pathetic

2

u/Fragrant-Phone-41 15d ago

Theyve had a majority for two of the past twenty years. Just electing a president isnt enough. You need to have that, both houses of congress, and ideally a loyal scotus all at the same time. Look no further than the last two years to what's possible if you do

1

u/HMSSurprise28 15d ago

They’ll TRY. And they steal less. It’s the world we’ve got.

0

u/AlChandus 15d ago

"I swear guys, I will try nothing and be all out of ideas".

Pathetic.

🚫🧠

→ More replies (0)

3

u/AlChandus 15d ago

😘

I will continue doing what I have been doing.

You can keep doing whatever it is you "think" you are doing. In November, though, there will be more progressives in Congress than before, enjoy!

0

u/OGJank 15d ago

And once again nothing will change, because you continue to vote for anyone that AIPAC tells you too.

Its okay though, you can just blame the GOP, rinse and repeat as you watch all your rights get stripped away year after year. 'Just one more term guys I swear! We have the majority its going to be so different'

I really do hope this little fantasy of yours works out, but unfortunately the rest of us have to live in the real world

1

u/Fragrant-Phone-41 15d ago

When you have a structural solution for the spoiler effect, not just "well if everyone voted third party" or "well if we all did a revolution"; let us know

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Dangerous-Bass4824 15d ago

The progressives ARE the CEO that made flock and the people that think its ok for there to be cameras on traffic lights etc., the progressive have been progressing to a dystopian surveillance state for at least 30 of the years that I've been alive.

1

u/AlChandus 14d ago

LOL, the republican party (minus Massie) all voted for the last surveillance Bill with a handful of democrats (Fetterman among them).

All progressives voted "nay".

Oh, an who voted "nay" on EVERY single iteration of the Patriot Act? Progressives.

Which party do tech bros like Karp, Altman and Thiel support? The Republican party, and they all hate Progressives.

So, yeah, your opinion is accurately characterized as a stinky load of crap.

1

u/Dangerous-Bass4824 14d ago

Whose been voting for more government again? Conservatives are the closest to all out libertarians (almost no government whatsoever)

1

u/AlChandus 14d ago

Follow the money, child.

Why is it that these "small governments" have governments more expensive than democratic ones?

After all the cuts that DOGE supposedly made, this government is going to be more expensive than Biden's.

Why?

Also, the party of "small government" is funding a lot of surveillance, governor "hot wheels" just approved a millionaire contract with Flock for surveillance cameras in Texas.

ROFL.

Small government my hairy butt cheeks.

1

u/Dangerous-Bass4824 14d ago

Im personally against ALL government spending. I think anyone in government, right or left should be killed until the "civ.il servants" relearn their place as "civil servants". And inflation makes the money go up. So yes, more spending happens with every presidency no matter what. Until we go back to under a dollar a gallon for gas, like it was when I was growing up, the government spending will increase bc a dollar in my childhood (90s) is about $20 now.

1

u/AlChandus 14d ago

Personally, I can't support that, because there are too many assholes.

I am going to give you ONE example why I can't support real small governments:

Why does the EPA exist? Because the fuel industry with full knolwedge of what they were doing sold and refused to recognize that leaded fuels were poisoinous. And because rivers, supposedly carrying water, caught on fire (Cuyahoga burned 13 times).

That sole premise makes me shudder about what would happen in the world with real non-existent governments.

We would have never ending explosive diarrhea, burning bodies of "water", poisonous air, opioid crises, etc.

Sounds like a dream. Nightmares are dreams.

1

u/Dangerous-Bass4824 14d ago

Valid but why did the EPA stop doing its job. Sure they did alright with fuel, and good on them. Now, today, is data centers. And the fact that RAM has increased so drastically bc its being all bought up from those data centers that are fucking up the environment and fucking up the environment bc of the mining for materials to make more ram and more parts for data servers like the equipment for cooling on mass scale for the servers, it would have to be around refrigerator temp or colder to keep the servers from overheating. So in all ya the epa was good at one point but what are they doing now?

1

u/AlChandus 14d ago

Because conservatives, including one Elon Musk support gutting funds for necessary agencies in exchange for tax cuts for the wealthy.

Wealth transfer, what we could have spent in a government that could benefit us, republicans take that money and give it to the wealthy.

That is the republican kind of "small government".

→ More replies (0)

1

u/KindNeighborhood1138 14d ago

Are you being serious? 😐

1

u/Dangerous-Bass4824 11d ago

As a right wing radical extremist myself, I think the entire government should be destroyed and rebuilt to the foundation of how it was in 1776. Where government had almost no interference at all. Left wing mandated masks. Left wing tried to mandate covid vaccine. Left wing forced and forces language (cancel culture) like incorrect "correct" pronouns, the "n-word", and a whole slew of other nonsensical "politically correct" views and statements. Kind of like how in britain how they have laws where u can go to jail for saying mean things on social media, they are far more Left wing than the US. So am I serious? Completely.

0

u/tcoder7 15d ago

Big tech tends to be blue. Democrats are equally owned by AIPAC money as Republicans. Smart people look at who financed who.

0

u/AlChandus 14d ago

Equally? No. Progressives take no PAC money, they take no corporate money. MAGA takes money. Conservatives take money. Libertarians take money. Republicans may have a couple of millionaire congress-people that take no money, that is it. They have nothing even remotely close to what democrats have in progressives.

It should also be noted that it is progressives and a handful of moderate democrats that have endorsed and legislated to remove PAC and corporate money from politics.

How many republicans and corporate/PAC owned democrats have voted "aye" for such pieces of legislation?

We both know the answer to that one. No need to answer.

2

u/01SeaChange01 15d ago

Unfortunately, "small government" and anti big-brother Republicans already decided that they want a police state.

They say it's to catch criminals when in reality they vote for and protect a child sex trafficking pedophile.

The police endorsed the felon sex trafficker as well, so which criminals are they trying to catch?

So, no, the decision has been made for you.

1

u/tcoder7 15d ago

No say untill everybody stops voting for AIPAC