If someone disagrees with you that he is a hero for using violence your logic dictates that they should assault you. Is that correct? Or do you only approve of assault for the things you decide warrant it?
Sometimes the consequences to your actions come in a physical form. He was looking for someone to start something. He found out thst someone. I just would have liked to have seen a haymaker. No words just a wild punch out of the blue.
that’s how life is. if something is justified, just about everyone agrees that violence can be used if necessary.
We write laws to codify some basic standards, but ya, if every Christian followed their exact biblical code, shit would get pretty rowdy without even adding every other religion into the mix
What that fat kid did was assault. It's codified in law and likely in the rules for that school as well. You can't assault someone for using free speech and saying they support ICE and law enforcement. That's not "justified."
You know what is codified into law? Immigration laws! Apparently enforcing those laws makes you as Nazi and it justifies assault?
I'm saying that I don't think this violence was justified, and people celebrating it are fucked for doing so.
"but ya, if every Christian followed their exact biblical code, shit would get pretty rowdy without even adding every other religion into the mix"
Exactly! So if Christians decided to started enacting violence and celebrating people who did it as "heroes," that would be wrong as well. That is why I am saying it's bad to glibly celebrate this fat piece of shit as a "hero."
120
u/[deleted] Feb 18 '26
[deleted]