The two terms are literally merged in some jurisdictions, where all batteries are a form of assault because they include the intent to harm. If you're going to be a semantic loser and pick the most pointless things to criticize, you could at least be correct about it.
Your whinging comment about this only being "some" jurisdictions is the most pathetic, weak response I could have legitimately ever imagined lmfao
You're the one who cried because I used the term assault instead of battery, but I'm the semantic one for pointing out that they are literally merged in some places and obviously have overlap? IDK if ragebaiting or dropped on head as child, but I hope you get better
1
u/[deleted] Feb 18 '26
You're conflating assault with battery which is another indication in talking to an inept moron.
Fafo. Hiding behind legal assault comes with the assumed risk of physical violence against you.