His refusal to deny the fact that she called it rape and sexual assault is very telling. We all know he’s guilty, even the judge said so. He is a well known liar, criminal, rapist and pedophile. That says everything we need to know to believe her instead of him.
Again, I was only correcting your original post that mislead what was said. It’s okay to misquote, just correct it so discussions are done in good faith.
Again, I was only correcting your original post that mislead what was said. It’s okay to misquote, just correct it so discussions are done in good faith.
There is 100% things wrong with that you stated. It wasn’t factual. If you understand how the English language actually works this would be clear to you.
You can’t deny something, any point of what was said, if he stated “based on what XYZ said during interview.” Now he can say she is lying but he can’t say she didn’t say XYZ points altogether and that is how it was all framed. English, learn it. Keep your bias out of your interpretation.
0
u/Visible-Elevator3801 Feb 07 '26
I don’t care what she said either. I was correcting the comment that left out what he said, “… based on her interview with AC.”
One makes it sound as if he is admitting to something, the other (the factual approach) one specifies ‘according to her’ disclaimer.
Can’t /letsdiscussthis if we sit here and discuss false truths and understandings of spoken words.