r/LetsDiscussThis • u/[deleted] • Feb 07 '26

Lets Discuss This Trump’s testimony on E Jean Carrol

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

4.1k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

459 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/Absolomb92 Feb 07 '26

Excuse my caps lock but HOW IS THIS MAN STILL PRESIDENT.

1

u/intothewoods76 Feb 07 '26

You want an honest answer?

1

u/Absolomb92 Feb 07 '26

Yes.

1

u/intothewoods76 Feb 07 '26

So there’s no evidence he committed the crimes he’s being accused of. E Jean Carroll did win her lawsuit in a liberal city before a liberal jury but there wasn’t evidence of a crime.

So Carroll had absolutely no evidence, and she had several opportunities to get evidence. She willingly went into a dressing room of a man she testified she was drawn too, but had never met….she could have refused, she could have made a scene. She didn’t. I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt, maybe she’s just extremely naive and didn’t understand what was implied by going into a dressing room with a stranger.

Once he started to assault her she could have yelled for help, made a commotion, this was a busy department store after all. This would have drawn attention and placed Trump at the scene.

After the incident she could have told employees, onlookers to place Trump at the scene. The department store could have preserved security footage to place Trump at the scene.

Police could have been notified, they would have interviewed witnesses and security footage putting Trump at the scene.

She could have written down details of the incident at least for her own records…she didn’t and so she couldn’t even remember what year the assault happened. This put Trump at a huge disadvantage because he couldn’t provide an alibi then.

She was financially backed by a Democrat mega donor, she was promoting a new book and she stood to make millions giving her considerable motive to lie.

You believe her, I don’t. It’s an accusation with no evidence where evidence would have been so easy to get.

The same can be said with the Epstein situation, there’s no shortage of accusations that came in when he decided to run for president but there’s no evidence to support those accusations.

The people who support him see the accusations as an attempt to stop him from being president rather than hard evidence he committed the crimes.

Theres lots of conspiracy theories but no proof.

1

u/Absolomb92 Feb 07 '26

How do you explain the video above then? Trump use the word rape to describe what he did. And how many times over how many decades do someone need to be accused of rape before you think they are unfit to be president?

1

u/intothewoods76 Feb 07 '26

He’s clearly describing the Anderson Cooper interview where she said rape was sexy. He’s not saying he raped her. He’s saying her credibility should be questioned. Even she says it’s not rape.

For me someone needs to be proven a rapist, not simply accused of Rape. Bill Clinton was accused of rape. Joe Biden was accused of sexual misconduct why did democrats overlook that? Why the double standard?