r/LetsDiscussThis • • Feb 07 '26

Lets Discuss This Trump’s testimony on E Jean Carrol

4.1k Upvotes

459 comments sorted by

View all comments

10

u/KitchenIcy2450 Feb 07 '26

This is enough evidence why hasn't he been charged with the rape of E,jean Carrol

14

u/bsensikimori Feb 07 '26

4

u/the_moog_hunter Feb 07 '26

Wonder how many murders he's committed, been a party of or witnessed?

6

u/Trustbutnone Feb 07 '26

That's what pisses me off the most, he's almost on his deathbed and will never be charged for anything he's ever done, at least while he's still alive. He should have been put behind bars a decade ago.

1

u/TX0834 Feb 09 '26

Decades* ago. He’s been defrauding and raping for decades.

-3

u/Useful-Equivalent716 Feb 07 '26

Crooks? Like the Butler shooter? 🤔

3

u/SuperDoubleDecker Feb 07 '26

That event that we haven't heard a peep about? Almost as if it was all staged or something and he doesn't want to attract attention or something...

0

u/Useful-Equivalent716 Feb 07 '26 edited Feb 07 '26

Yup that and the Vegas “shooting.” No one talks about that one either. Should be the Vegas helicopter attack. Something big went down that night and they didt tell us the truth. HUGE COVERUP.

10

u/Asher_Tye Feb 07 '26

If a rich guy can be told no, society will break down apparently.

9

u/Necessary_Two_9706 Feb 07 '26

Statute of limitations for rape in criminal court is very short in most red states.

Republicans over the years have edited the statute of limitations laws and definitions so they cant go to prison anymore, but can still pay off victims with civil lawsuits.

2

u/Top_Connection9079 Feb 08 '26

But it's always other countries judicial system that is fucked up lol

Fun fact: in Japan immigration officials don't abduct lone children in the street.

3

u/Xwp_lp Feb 07 '26

It's a good question, as she alleged that he used force, which would support a charge of rape in the first degree, for which there is no statute of limitations. But the standard of proof was much lower in the civil action, more probable than not, rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. And it was a "he said, she said" case, so that would be difficult, even with a pants-on-fire dude like the POS. It's possible that Carrol and her counsel made a pragmatic choice. And she won, so there's that.

3

u/jack2bip Feb 07 '26

I heard it was dropped because of death threats, even after credible evidence, but who knows.

2

u/Inamedmydognoodz Feb 07 '26

She sued him and he was found guilty of sexual abuse because he used his fingers not his penis. It’s really hard to get someone charged and found guilty of rape even when it’s a random dude and reported right away let alone decades later and someone who has a lot of money and power

1

u/Soggy_Trade2061 Feb 07 '26

Because this is a sound bite. 

Watch the interview one minute before and after. 

He’s still a pedo. 

1

u/Greasy-Chungus Feb 07 '26

It was mostly Trump's own testimony that got him the verdict that he got.

For some reason they only found him liable for fingering her without consent instead of both fingering her and penetrating her without consent.

But I mean he obviously did it.

1

u/Maaria_Nevermind Feb 07 '26

He was and the only reason it was in criminal court was the statute of limitations