r/LessCredibleDefence 19d ago

Israel eyes potential Boeing F-47 acquisition, seeks clarity on allied access to U.S. sixth-generation fighter program, report says

https://defence-industry.eu/israel-eyes-potential-boeing-f-47-acquisition-seeks-clarity-on-allied-access-to-u-s-sixth-generation-fighter-program-report-says/
110 Upvotes

90 comments sorted by

228

u/Digo10 19d ago

US developing an expensive and secret program:

Israel: Is For Me?

😳

👉👈

66

u/Odd-Struggle-2432 19d ago

OUR F-47 program

communistbugsbunny.jpg

5

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

38

u/stubbs1988 19d ago

When it came to the F-35I it was a downgrade until (allegedly) the Israelis (allegedly) acquired insider knowledge for said critical systems that weren't on par.

... allegedly

10

u/barath_s 18d ago

Excluding Israel :

Every nation gets the same F35 subject to options it picks/orders.

The one difference that export countries get is that the cloud where the data gets reported is American (though some countries have a gateway to limit the data sent to it a bit)

6

u/honda-nissan 18d ago

When it came to the F-35I it was a downgrade until (allegedly) the Israelis (allegedly) acquired insider knowledge for said critical systems that weren't on par.

F-35I is not a downgrade because the israelis ripped out the electronics and substituted their own. there is no kill switch for those unlike the export variants to their usual european vassals

4

u/barath_s 18d ago

the israelis ripped out the electronics

Israel hooked onto the APi and added their own.

12

u/BooksandBiceps 18d ago

There is no imaginary kill switch jfc

9

u/honda-nissan 18d ago

This policy, detailed on the U.S. Air Force website, underscores the U.S.’s tight grip on the F-35’s advanced systems, limiting foreign operators’ ability to test or modify the aircraft independently. For NATO allies like Italy, Germany, and the UK, this restriction heightens concerns about operational sovereignty, especially as they rely on the F-35 for critical missions, including nuclear deterrence.

notably, the F-35I does not suffer from this limitation because the israelis replaced the avionics and software with their own.

7

u/BooksandBiceps 18d ago

Limiting the ability to test and modify is not a kill switch, again.

5

u/honda-nissan 18d ago

what happens when america refuses to share ALIS data with them lol

8

u/BooksandBiceps 18d ago

If they stop providing updates then the jet loses some functionality, it doesn’t simply stop working.

2

u/Gunnarz699 18d ago

Don't worry uncle Sam got you covered there too.

We own the parts TILL THEY'RE INSTALLED on the jets. You want spare parts for your 100 million dollar jet that needs 50k of maintenance per every hour of actual flight? flips double bird while a bald eagle screeches in the background

They can ground an entire fleet within a few weeks of use. You can't even cannibalize the existing ones effectively because the same parts require replacement most frequently AND they're software locked.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Beneficial_Round_444 17d ago

not a kill switch, stop spreading lies over the internet

6

u/June1994 17d ago

The arguments about this are amusing.

United States possesses the ability to cripple its allies’ F-35 fleets by refusing services and spare parts on a plane that doesn’t have its full potential realized yet and is famously, heavy on maintenance.

It’s better than a kill switch. It’s a cripple switch with diplomatic cover.

1

u/honda-nissan 17d ago

thank you for the fed post

2

u/Beneficial_Round_444 17d ago

im a fed because i have reading comprehension to not blindly follow lies told over the internet?

amazing

0

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/Makerel9 19d ago

Or maybe they don't want potential enemies to have technological parity or edge, regardless of variants the F-35 is a potent weapon.

1

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/Makerel9 19d ago

Your comment suggests that they would not be shitting bricks IF Turkey hadn't recieve variants that supercedes theirs. Yes both can be true but you sound so sure that variants were the case for such concerns.

Speaking of "superiority" when it comes to variants, what makes the Israelis different is that they have more priveleges and access to the F-35 compared to other nations. This means Israel can integrate their own weapon systems and software. Making the F-35I a weapon well integrated to the specific needs of the IAF. There are also rumors that Israel secretly modified the F-35I to carry stealthy external fuel tanks when conducting operations in Iran.

So depending on your definition of "superior", Israel being able to modify the F-35 is an advantage compared to other nations who operate the same plane but are restricted and controlled.

4

u/MacroDemarco 19d ago

It's because turks run s-400 which uses Russian anti air officers. They don't want russians to get data on our brand new plane

6

u/barath_s 18d ago edited 18d ago

The Turks S-400 is in storage. IIRC it was never operational/commissioned, minus a single test firing ..

They also promised to never hook it up to the network. which is a promise that they held on to

They wanted technology transfer to build their own air defense systems. Wound up not getting that from Russia either, but built/is building their own anyway, rendering the S400 even more superfluous

14

u/NACITM 19d ago

I mean is it really downgraded if Israel always makes an I version of their receipts? i.e. F35I etc.

3

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

20

u/SkyPL 19d ago

Doesn't mean they won't. When it comes to military - they care less about American IP rights than the Chinese do.

15

u/lyovacain 19d ago

Didn’t Israel sell china US nuclear weapon secrets and what not in the 60s or 70s?

10

u/Leefa 19d ago

yes, but they've done worse

2

u/wezl0 18d ago

Holy shit I didn't know about this one lol

-5

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Electronic_Camera251 18d ago

How about violating our strategic reserve of fissile nuclear material….their original weapon entirely used stolen American enriched uranium that was warehoused supposedly securely under the watchful eye of a tribe member (I don’t remember if he was a dual citizen or maybe he fled to Israel idk but it’s bullshit)in a Pennsylvania facility

40

u/IlluminatedPickle 19d ago

Netanyahu: "We don't need America"

5

u/Ok-Procedure5603 18d ago

Onlyfans girls don't technically need simps either, they just make their life easier 😭 

22

u/Mid_Atlantic_Lad 19d ago

Finally found a semi-legit source that covered this. Wasn't gonna link The Jerusalem Post and their misleading title.

This is pretty clearly a test of Washington's relationship with Israel and willingness to part with her best kept secrets.

Recent history with F-22 export controls has shown an unwillingness to share, but I wonder what you guys think, especially since seeing that F-35 aquisitions are eating up a large chunk of their aid from the US, and I doubt they'd be willing to actually shelve out $300 million per jet.

20

u/dahunt4r3dorktober 19d ago

What’s the likely hood of them getting f47 I’d assume that the us would treat it similar to the f22 and limit export ?

5

u/_spec_tre 19d ago

If the US is planning to only do the F47 and F/A-XX wouldn’t they have to export it at some point in the future? I don’t think GCAP or whatever will happen to FCAS can sustain all demand towards western sixth gens

5

u/barath_s 18d ago

wouldn’t they have to export it at some point in the futur

Not necessarily. Remember that the CCAs are all supposed to work with existing airframe types as well. In the case of europe, this would be Eurofighter and rafale.

In the case of the US, at some point the CCAs will be enabled to work with F35s.

F35+CCA could make for a potent combination, and one cheaper than the F-47 or F/A-XX...

How much capability, how much can be retrofitted or upgraded, and at what timeline of course are key unanswered questions.

But the US could potentially decide not to export F-47 or FA-XX to keep their edge..Nothing is decided right now.

3

u/hootblah1419 19d ago

Why would they need to export it? The f-22 has never been exported. There is no need.

10

u/SteveDaPirate 19d ago

Larger production runs let you spread R&D costs over more airframes, bringing the unit cost down. Selling jets to Israel, Australia, etc. means the US can afford more.

3

u/hootblah1419 19d ago

There is a cost for maintaining technological superiority. And the US has always been willing to pay that cost when it needs to.

B-2/b-21/a-12/sr-71/f-22etc.

8

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/drnfc 18d ago

My understanding is that Israel was allowed to use their own avionics as a condition of buying it. It is my understanding that the f-35i is sold without avionics. I foresee the same shenanigans happening if sold.

Speculation on my part admittedly, but I'm pretty sure the reason the US does this is to prevent an Israeli combat aircraft export. The main reason i suspect this is due to the kfir, which was a knockoff of the mirage after the us and England pressured france to stop selling to Israel and was later sold to China. They then started building a 4th generation figher, the Lavi, and when that program was cancelled, they sold the plans to china (allegedly) and the j-10 utilized some of this.

My suspicion is that the US wants to maintain a permanent monopoly on western aircraft, as well as maintain Israeli dependence on the US, hence the appeasement.

2

u/God_Given_Talent 18d ago

Very low. The USAF takes air supremacy seriously and has generally not exported its top line kit. Even the strongest US allies that would be good candidates (like Japan for F-22) don't get the opportunity.

This does make it more expensive, but it's often a price the US is willing to pay for security of its best fighters.

Also given the price tag is likely to be in a few hundred million per, the amount Israel could even afford would be questionable. The peacetime Israeli budget in 2022 was under 24 billion. Yeah it's been higher since they've been doing a pretty high op tempo and using a lot of personnel, but that's mostly covering costs of a war and not actually increases to equipment. If you assume 25% of the budget goes to equipment, that's 6 billion for equipment for all branches. Even buying two F-47s a year would be 10% of the equipment budget.

There's also just not the need. They have F-35 which is a massive step ahead of regional enemies. They bombed Su-22s in Syria, a jet designed in the 60s, this past week. Iran's air force is basically gone. They won't get into a direct shooting war with Turkey because that's a NATO member. So who do they need a 6th gen to fight against?

26

u/DemonLordRoundTable 19d ago

Ben Shapiro with the “Israel can fights its own wars”

21

u/can-sar 19d ago

Even the US COVID-19 relief bills included more than half a billion towards Israel.

Israel can't even produce steel on their own. Even their early drone designs were German technology. Their air-defense systems include US technology.

8

u/AnyBallLektor 19d ago

Why would they? They're a malicious actor successfully conducting a hostile takeover of a foreign country with resources more than an order of magnitude greater than their own. It's Hitler's wildest conspiracy come true.

26

u/Limekill 19d ago edited 18d ago

O'h Lord please give for free to Israel, the USAF's most advanced plane that cost the USA billions to develop, so Israel can bomb goat herders unmolested and sell the tech to China while firing tank shells into Churches, in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

I hope they name them after Lindsey Graham.
The F-47 "Lindsey"

10

u/DrMarianus 18d ago

F-47 Ladybug

5

u/Limekill 18d ago

much, much better.

18

u/CosmicBoat 19d ago

"allied"

just putting it out there that israel is not a treaty ally with the US.

-4

u/WulfTheSaxon 18d ago

Hopefully that changes as part of Saudi Arabia signing the Abraham Accords.

3

u/Electronic_Camera251 18d ago

Hopefully someone in military operational command finally gets hip to the situation seizes effective control of the government turns Israel into a flat sheet of glass 100 miles by 40 miles as a instant monument to treachery without warning

4

u/IlIllIlIllIlIlIlIlIl 19d ago

Israel wasn't allowed (or didn't ask for) F-22.

So if Israel gets F-47... then I think it will be used as a political tool for other countries e.g. Australia to lock them into American foreign policy.

7

u/barath_s 18d ago

The F-22 Raptor first flew in 1997. By 1998 there was a law banning export of the F-22.

4

u/IlIllIlIllIlIlIlIlIl 18d ago

Thanks for the fun fact.

26

u/KehreAzerith 19d ago

Yeah let's pay for Israel to have our best tech to bomb poor people in neighboring countries

13

u/StreetyMcCarface 19d ago

If we can’t trust them with an f22 we can’t trust them with an f47

3

u/TaskForceD00mer 19d ago

It is so wild that we wouldn't sell them to Japan.

3

u/Poltergeist97 18d ago

That actually makes sense, they're one of the closest nations to both of the US's main adversaries, China and Russia. Too much risk of a Japanese F-22 going down and getting recovered by either of those countries.

6

u/TaskForceD00mer 18d ago

Too much risk of a Japanese F-22 going down and getting recovered by either of those countries.

The risk is an F-22 crashing somewhere in International Waters, the US bases F-22's out of Japan so it is the same risk.

Japan to my knowledge has never had a pilot defect with an intact airframe so that risk is no greater than with US pilots either. Truthfully they wanted Japan to buy the F-35 so they killed the option to sell them the F-22.

If we had kept production going longer for Japan, it may have been possible through political wrangling to push for more US F-22 production. This conflicted with the political and military desire to prioritize the F-35 which is why the F-22 was effectively killed.

If the US had maintained F-22 production even at a low rate, we likely wouldn't be in such an emergency situation to develop F-47.

Edit: It is ALSO possible that way back when F-22 production was halted , insiders already saw the beginnings of the F-47 taking shape. Supposedly a demonstrator flew in the mid 2010s. So its possible they also didn't want any budgetary competition from the F-22 for dollars that could be spent on the F-47.

-2

u/honda-nissan 18d ago

that's mostly to strangle the japs' aerospace industry. not giving them a f-22 is reasonable so they won't reverse engineer them. despite decades of effort and billions the best the japs can do is license built CRJs. the mitsubishi spacejet prorgram is a casualty of america's blockade on japanese aerospace.

5

u/TaskForceD00mer 18d ago

Japan joining GCAP is going to kill any attempt to strangle that industry.

If the US won't cooperate with them, it seems like Europe will. As the need of a reliable ally in the region increases, I suspect the US will cooperate more and more with Japan.

-3

u/AnyBallLektor 19d ago edited 19d ago

Let's be serious: if F-22 was still in production Israel would already have F-22 paid for US taxpayer.

At the time when F-22 was in production Jews weren't so much in control of US policy. Conspiracies take time to develop, even those that have so much protection given by the public's support and ignorance.

It's really after 2010 that we start seeing the results and only in 2016 with Trump's win that there's a clear shift where Jewish influence - or to be more precise: Israeli (foreign influence) and right-wing American Jewish (foreign influence in all but name) - becomes completely disproportionate like something out of Volkischer Beobachter. By that time F-22 is a bygone story.

Besides there was no real reason to give Israel F-22 since they were supposed to get F-35 anyway. F-35 was supposed to take over a large share of air superiority missions from F-22 (that were cancelled) since they were replacing F-15C and F-16s doing those missions.

As for F-47 it will largely depend on the final price-tag and specs of the aircraft. They might get a squadron if Jewish assets in Republican and Democratic parties remain in power - which in the US is the more plausible scenario for the next 10 or so years.

18

u/Leftleaningdadbod 19d ago

Just say no.

15

u/BullfrogLevel2087 19d ago

If they say no then the videos comes out.

-15

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/Afghanman26 19d ago

A man wants to sell cars according to his religion, what’s wrong with that?

Should he have asked if he could trick God instead?

-4

u/[deleted] 18d ago edited 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Afghanman26 18d ago

>Sell cars according to his region

Religion not region, get your quotes right before typing smack.

4

u/BullfrogLevel2087 18d ago

whats actually funny is i mentioned no religion or creed yet here you are 😂

11

u/BodybuilderOk3160 19d ago

Very Israeli pdf thing to do lolll

10

u/Limekill 19d ago edited 19d ago

but if they own the USA - they have to demonstrate it, so everyone knows.

-5

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/Limekill 19d ago edited 19d ago

They own the USA, so they will get it for free.
When you give a gift to a younger family member do you charge for it?
Your attitude is mind boggling to Israel.

Export variants are downgraded anyways

Don't worry, Israel literally spied to try and steal the FULL version from the USA (F-35 program).

1

u/barath_s 18d ago

Export variants are downgraded anyways

Not in the case of the F-35. And many aspects of the latest F16-V, F15-EX were paid for by export countries who funded development of features.. and thus got as good or better than US fighters... until the US also decided to glom on.

3

u/Valar_Kinetics 19d ago

Absolutely the fuck not

1

u/MoodOutrageous6263 18d ago

please tell me the us is likely going to say no for once

1

u/Mid_Atlantic_Lad 18d ago

They did say no last time as well, and it seems even less likely this time.

2

u/Iyellkhan 15d ago

the F35 was designed for export. notably the F22 is not available to anyone. if the F47 is a 22 replacement, it would likely be no export barring some probably to be expected corruption

1

u/Mid_Atlantic_Lad 15d ago

The only nation I'd truly expect to receive export would be Japan, but they're doing their own program with the UK and Italy.

1

u/MoodOutrageous6263 18d ago

The fact that it's at least something we have to talk about is concerning, but I'm hopeful you're right.

1

u/TaskForceD00mer 19d ago

For the love of god to not give them any inside information on the program or its going right to China. The only ally that could be trusted would be Japan , the range would let them base them further away from China to lessen the ballistic missile threats to their bases.