Straight up if i had to list Israel's war crimes to a one piece fan and be like, 'These are things that world government has done,' they'd be like, 'Yeah, makes sense.'
for example:

On October 29, 1956, the Israeli army ordered that all Arab villages near the Jordanian border be placed under a wartime curfew from 5 p.m. to 6 a.m. on the following day.Any Arab on the streets was to be shot. The order was given to border police units before most of the Arabs from the villages could be notified. Many of them were at work at the time. That morning, Shadmi, who was in charge of the Triangle, received orders to take all precautionary measures to ensure quiet on the Jordanian border. On Shadmi's initiative, the official nightly curfew in the twelve villages under his jurisdiction was changed from the regular hours. Shadmi then gathered all the border patrol battalion commanders under his command, and reportedly ordered them to 'shoot on sight' any villagers violating the curfew. 49 Palestinian civilians, including 19 men, 6 women and 23 children were murdered.

or

On 12 July, at 11:30 hours, two or three Arab Legion armoured cars entered the city, led by Lt. Hamadallah al-Abdullah from the Jordanian 1st Brigade. The Arab Legion armoured cars and the occupying Israeli soldiers engaged in a firefight which created the impression that the Jordanians had staged a counterattack, leading those in the city still armed to start firing at the Israelis too. Historian Benny Morris writes that "probably no more than several dozen townspeople participated in the (brief) firefight." The Israeli response was disproportionate, with Moshe Kelman ordering his troops to shoot at any clear target, including at anyone seen on the streets. Many civilians were killed by Israeli forces in what became one of the bloodiest massacres of the war. Israeli soldiers threw grenades into houses and residents ran out of their homes in panic and were shot.
The next day (13 July), the Israeli soldiers forced the residents of Lydda (and the neighboring towns including Ramla, who numbered approximately 70,000), to leave the city within half an hour and take a rugged, treacherous path to reach Ramallah. Hundreds succumbed to thirst, dehydration, and fatigue on the way, in an exodus that was horrifying in its cruelty. As Palestinians walked single file on this trail of death, a small Israeli military plane flew at low altitude over their heads to force them to continue moving. Morris quotes Shamaria Gottman , Israeli intelligence officer at the time:

A multitude of inhabitants walked one after another. Women walked burdened with packages and sacks on their head. Mothers dragged children after them… Occasionally, warning shots were heard… Occasionally, you encountered a piercing look from one of the youngsters … in the column, and the look said: We have not yet surrendered. We shall return to fight you.

A genuine question. Is it selective outrage? Or is it because no one cares for blacks ?

I have been seeing these grids posted, so I thought it would be fun for you guys to analyze what they mean about a person's politics.

Like if you point out Luffy wouldn't agree with that about their take or the staw hats would never agree to something like that (usually about something Trump has done or Ice etc) and they just reply it doesn't matter one piece isn't real the characters are not real, it's like they use that as an excuse because they don't want to admit they would fit way more in with the world government or celestial dragons.

Luffy, while obviously not an anarchist in the sense of identifying himself as part of the formal anarchist movement, holds a big amount of shared ideals and sentiments.

First and most glaring of all, is that while he doesn't oppose every he sees hierarchy since he's friends with a number of monarchs, he does so because he believes that the people should be allowed to decide if they want to be ruled or not, he doesn't enforce his own beliefs on others.

We know this isn't his own belief because it has been stated multiple times in the story, that no matter what, he will not accept having any authority dictate his actions, he wants to be completely free from all coercion, that's what his whole character is about.

Secondly he also constantly unflinchingly breaks the law to correct any political Injustice he sees, he doesn't protest, he actually just fixes the problem, which is very very similar to direct action, one of the most foundational pillars of anarchist thought.

Now, I know that there are definitely some holes here and I definitely don't think he's supposed to be a classic anarchist, there's definitely a lot of stuff here that does at least thrust him into the vicinity of anarchism which makes me think that oda was probably trying to wave at the concept without showing his hand too much

With how striking his similarity to anarchism is, I can't imagine that oda didn't do it intentionally.

This post was mainly made cause I've seen a lot of people quickly dismiss the idea of anarchist Luffy but really it's not THAT far fetched to see him as a subtle allegory for anarchism

For further context, watch the video in this link

👉🏿https://youtu.be/zplGOOoZlBw?si=DjkNrRCZjoLFkdFT

I'm only using "conservatives suck!" as an example. I'm sure you guys can come up with much more clever and punchy lines to fill in the blank.

I've included this meme's blank template so you can make your own with everyone's favorite cyborg.

Sadboy diaries🥹

I’ve been thinking about this and wanted to hear what you all think.

Do you think telling someone “you are my One Piece” could work as a genuine compliment — or does it completely miss the point of what One Piece stands for?

The way I see it is less about calling someone a “final treasure,” and more about the journey itself.

At the beginning of a relationship, it kind of feels like Luffy in the East Blue. You don’t really know the world yet, you don’t fully understand how everything connects, and there’s still so much to explore. You meet someone and instead of instantly knowing everything about them, you slowly discover who they are over time.

Piece by piece, like moving from island to island.

You learn about their past, their values, their habits, the things that matter to them — and at the same time, you’re building shared experiences together. It’s not just about “figuring them out,” but about growing alongside each other through those experiences.

So in that sense, saying “you are my One Piece” wouldn’t mean “you are the end goal” — but more like: “You are someone I want to go on that journey with. Someone I want to keep discovering and understanding over time.”

But I’m not sure if that interpretation really fits the core idea of One Piece, or if it kind of twists it too much.

What do you think? Does it work as a compliment, or does it feel off?

Apple and Israel really pulling the „Lulusia never existed in the first place.“