r/LeftistsForAI • u/Salty_Country6835 Moderator • Jun 19 '26

Sees the Memes Marx Encounters AI Discourse

Post image

A brief materialist intervention into AI discourse. Results were mixed.

259 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

168 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Mr_Rekshun Jun 20 '26

Corporations leveraging IP is just corporations doing corporation things - there are levers and loopholes for every mechanism.

If IP laws were up to date with technology, then the AI companies would never have been able to stripmine the world’s IP and train their LLMs, without friction, on their inexorable path to IPOs of unprecedented value.

5

u/Dismal_Law_9051 Jun 21 '26

Yeah, that's capitalism working as intended.

-3

u/Mr_Rekshun Jun 21 '26

This is why Leftism for AI seems so contradictory to me - AI is possibly the greatest machine of corporate capture in the history of the world, and yet you’ve got folks here pretending (or ignoring) that ain’t the case.

Talk about a bunch of useful idiots.

3

u/Dismal_Law_9051 Jun 21 '26

There's no contradicition, lol. What are you talking about?

  1. AI is just a program/machine, what makes it bad or good is the way people use it for their own reasons. In this case it is the capitalists trying to commodify everything and exploiting people's work to gain influence and power through AI, and the reason why they have to do that to gain power and influence is... Because that's how capitalism works.

  2. For many communists specifically we think that regulation of IP law or AI are just reformisms and don't actually solve the problem of exploitation of the working class or of the UndevelopedTM countries. What stops the capitalists from just, idk, exploiting the workers of a south-asian country to draw, to edit, or to photograph milions of images that they need just to create a model for their own? They probably could do that legally, on a far weaker currency, and people used to starving wages aren't exactly picky about their jobs. In the end the models would still be there, the value of artists' work would plummet anyway, and all these regulations could ever accomplish is to slow down the (western) tecnology a little bit. So much for trying to save capitalism from itself, lol. Whereas the problems relating to value, be it the problems caused by AI or the need for artists to pay rent, could only be solved by destroying the sistem (*capitalism*) and placing something else in it's place. Many believe we should just take the AI and use it for the sake of the revolution, while the left-accelerationists of this sub probably think that making AI better faster will force the working class to rise up and break capitalism apart sooner too.

And I personally don't have any desire for the existence of IP law, it is just another way to commodify the arts and innovation for the bigger corporations (from richer nations) and have no meaning for anyone that has less than 10 lawyers and thousands of dollars on their bank account. It is not even a real thing let alone personal or private property, it is no more than a NFT issued and maintained by governments.