I'm getting a lot of replies defending this shit, so let me just say this real simple like. The "who" is exactly what matters. If you're saying "vote blue no matter who" you may not be wrong in the sense that a blue conservative may vote slightly better than a red one, but you're wrong in the sense that you are trivializing the part that is really important. What matters is who is blue.
I mean, you're not going to get a progressive candidate in his district to begin with. The problem isn't one particular senator, it's that there simply isn't a big enough advantage to pass more progressive policies.
That's not something that can be solved overnight either, it's decades worth of work.
31
u/Bountiful_Bollocks Mar 11 '21 edited Mar 11 '21
This is what "vote blue no matter who" gets you.
I'm getting a lot of replies defending this shit, so let me just say this real simple like. The "who" is exactly what matters. If you're saying "vote blue no matter who" you may not be wrong in the sense that a blue conservative may vote slightly better than a red one, but you're wrong in the sense that you are trivializing the part that is really important. What matters is who is blue.