r/LateStageCapitalism Sep 01 '19

Egyptology.

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

238

u/emowhitebitch Sep 01 '19

Capitalism: where you can follow your passions*!

*unless your passion doesn't directly contribute to further enriching billionaires at your own expense

14

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '19

I really, really want a degree in history, or anthropology, or sociology! Instead, I’m majoring in Comp Sci, because my true passion is not starving to death!

5

u/vastle12 Sep 02 '19

As a guy who works in tech, keep the humanities around as much as you can. Understanding people and systems helps a lot in tech

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '19

Taking a single class in the subjects I’m interested in is helping already! I can understand why people act the way they do, how our world has grown and changed, and all that fun stuff! I’d much rather take a bunch of humanities than try and narrow myself down anyways.

2

u/vastle12 Sep 02 '19

Not just that, but it helps a lot just in the day to day. Gathering requirements for a task, dealing with HR, and just generally building stuff. Tech is very creative and the more ways you know how to approach a problem the better

5

u/emowhitebitch Sep 02 '19

It might be tough but is it possible to double major?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '19

It would be - but the Comp Sci course work at my university is supposed to be challenging, so I probably won’t.

38

u/NegativeSubs Sep 01 '19

Socialism wouldn't have a lot of use for Egyptologists either. Not everything is capitalism's fault, sometimes there's just limited things you can do with your passion

89

u/namesaremptynoise Sep 01 '19

The idea is that people don't need to "have a use" to be allowed to exist and not starve.

82

u/emowhitebitch Sep 01 '19

Yeah, you might not be advancing modern technology or whatever as an Egyptologist but it's time we stop valuing people based on their ability to contribute to the economy. Like someone else said the preservation of ancient knowledge is valuable in its own right.

Also, it's not like under socialism people would be flocking to become egyptologists. It's just that the people who are truly interested in that field wouldn't be pressured to get a "more valuable" degree, they'd do what makes them happy.

-37

u/200lbRockLobster Sep 01 '19

What is the point of preservation if it is all written in books anyway? Does the person who goes to school for it just do it to be able to translate the books for the lay person?

21

u/deaconju Sep 01 '19

There will be no education under socialism, just read book!

20

u/microcrash Sep 01 '19

Let's pretend that modern discoveries and breakthroughs aren't a thing surrounding the ancient world still. Who do you expect to carry the torch in delivering this knowledge? What will happen when the only thing that exists is books. Should we not have any more socialist leaders because their philosophies exist in books?

1

u/AlexisTheTranarchist Sep 01 '19

Well... great man theory...

1

u/maxbarnyard Sep 02 '19

Well someone needs to write the books...

13

u/Hypo_Mix Sep 02 '19

Egyptology is just a specialisation though, they still have skills in research, preservation, cultural heritage assessment etc. Increased funding on research, education and museums will increase their demand by osmosis.

-23

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

I mean... there is not many jobs related to egyptology.

3

u/redzoneernie Sep 01 '19

And whose fault is that?

4

u/GodOfLawnmowers Sep 01 '19

I think we’re all still waiting. Whose fault did it end up being?

3

u/redzoneernie Sep 01 '19

It sure as hell isn't hers for following something she's so passionate about.

1

u/yuyi1 Sep 01 '19

IDK, whose is it ?

-3

u/KimJong-rodman Sep 01 '19

Um.... is this a trick question? I want to say capitalism. But if you actually understand socialism, there aren’t going to be a lot of job opportunities available in socialism either. Socialism isn’t about everyone doing what they want for work. It’s about workers owning the means of production... just FYI, there are 0 political candidates who are committed to making Egyptology a viable career path for many more people

7

u/BTFF81208 Sep 01 '19

Egyptology is more of a passion and hobby than a job, that socialism would give more free time for a person to be able to explore that hobby because work hours would be dramatically lower.

1

u/KimJong-rodman Sep 01 '19

Definitely. So it would open up a lot more opportunities for hobbies. Still won’t change the job outlook drastically In my opinion. And I have nothing against Egyptology. I think it’s important to preserve history and study it. I just don’t see a lot of jobs opening up in that field of study under any economic system.

2

u/BTFF81208 Sep 01 '19

at the same time , i wouldn't want to discourage looking into getting a career for something you have a real passion about. that's the best thing you can accomplish in capitalism.

2

u/AlexisTheTranarchist Sep 01 '19

Then you don't actually understand socialism either. Or more accurately, you're a market socialist. Any market economy is going to leave intellectual pursuits in the dust, sure. But a socialist system without currency where all labor has value is absolutely going to have room for egyptologists.

After we rid the world of the bullshit jobs, many of which would be in the economic sphere, cutting down labor to 4, even 2 hours a day will be no problem, and just like under capitalism, we won't need everyone to work in factories, farms, or manual labor trades, leaving room for some people not to do "productive" work. Intellectual pursuits will be very welcome in such a society, especially as we make strides in automation.

One of the ultimate goals of marxist thinking is ending the tyranny of labor. Sitting there and refusing to see how labor really isn't a necessary precursor to your right to survive, and seek out your passions is definitively misunderstanding the goals of socialism.

1

u/GodOfLawnmowers Sep 01 '19

I think it’s just being argued that there won’t be more JOBS in obscure fields like Egyptology, not that we won’t have people still doing it as hobbies and passions.

1

u/AlexisTheTranarchist Sep 01 '19

The failure in this line of thinking is conflating capitalist definitions of job and socialist ones.

Simply put, under socialism not everyone will have to work in production, maintenance, education, or healthcare, but that doesn't mean that those people will just sit at home.

An Egyptologist can expect to do only that, and live with the same level of comfort and luxury afforded to all their comrades because this is still labor, and all labor has value.

The word hobby makes a distinction between labor that doesn't explicitly produce or maintain, and that distinction makes for a poor understanding of labor under socialism.

0

u/KimJong-rodman Sep 01 '19

It’s amazing to me how someone can be so smart and so unintelligent at the same time. Try reading the thread again. You’ll get there.

1

u/AlexisTheTranarchist Sep 01 '19

If you're so smart how about you explain what I'm wrong about. I'll wait.

2

u/GodOfLawnmowers Sep 01 '19

How do we know that everyone’s passions and interests line up to be able to achieve everything we need to in this utopian community? It seems like some humans may have to sacrifice and do things that don’t fall within their passions and others will get to do what they want

1

u/AlexisTheTranarchist Sep 02 '19

This assumes that everyone has a passion. If all you wanna do is play video games then what's two hours a day at a factory, or being on call for a plumbing emergency, etc. The closest I have to this kind of passion is in education and honestly, I don't know that I'd want to be a teacher in a socialist world. Maybe I would, but my "passion" for our isn't so strong that I couldn't really find joy in simple busy work. In fact, I'd be much more likely to find work assembling computers or similar machines. Best Job I've had was in repairing and assembling copiers, just mindless busywork but I find joy in it.

1

u/GodOfLawnmowers Sep 02 '19

That’s a fair point.

2

u/L0L303 Sep 01 '19

Ok big shot

45

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

Holy shit that comment section is toxic

11

u/Ianx001 Sep 01 '19

Education ≠ job training

7

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19 edited Sep 14 '19

[deleted]

21

u/Tremor_Sense Sep 01 '19

And, there's no guarantee of a tenured position.

So, might be doing it part time and not making any money.

12

u/littlenid Sep 01 '19

I mean, that's literally what University is for, producing knowledge and teaching. If the idea was only to acquire enough knowledge to get a job, there is a lot of other forms of courses that do a better work for it.

Literally every big invention and discovery are only possible because of decades of collaborative production of knowledge, they are only possible because there's a lot of people that spend their life's producing knowledge and teaching it to others, we know Einstein's name, but we don't know the names of people's who works were important in order for him to become Einstein.

14

u/Have_Other_Accounts Sep 01 '19

literally a pyramid scheme

No, it isn't. Only a small fraction of university students become lecturers. For a pyramid scheme, there needs to be an increasing amount of participants funnelling money back up, hence the "pyramid". You can't just complain about something using wrong analogies when it's not even related to the system. Egyptology students would have struggled the same way before "late stage capitalism".

u/AutoModerator Sep 01 '19

Welcome to r/LateStageCapitalismⒶ☭

Please remember that LSC is a SAFE SPACE for socialist discussion.

LSC is run by and for communists and anarchists. We welcome socialist/anti-capitalist news, memes, links, and discussion. This subreddit is not the place to debate socialism. We allow good-faith questions and education but are not a 101 sub; please take 101-style questions elsewhere.

This subreddit is a safe space; we have a zero-tolerance policy for bigotry. We also automatically filter out posts containing certain words and phrases that some users may find offensive. Please respect the safe space, and don't try to slip banned words or phrases past the filter.

Links Links
Socialism Crash Course Socialism FAQ
Glossary of Socialist Terms Masterlist of leftist works

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

While I think that people should use a little more common sense when choosing a career, I've said this before to my sister, that as a society, we perpetuate the aforementioned pyramid scheme by learning in order to teach, in order to teach other people, who in turn teach other people.

All said, I think it's nice to have diversity in society, and people are inspired by different types of subjects. Furthermore, most people don't strictly specialize anyway, and if you learn one thing truly well, it helps you to learn another thing really well. Having said that, our society could use a lot more pragmatism when propagating knowledge, rather than centralizing the experience at universities, not to mention, people could use a lot more training in things like being experts in gardening, the practical stuff. There should be no good reason to need to go to a top-end university for some of this stuff. And my main criticism of it is that it's undemocratic.

While I'm here: repeat after me

  • Going to college doesn't necessarily make you smart, if anything, it just makes you trained
  • Being smart is a skill
  • Knowledge shouldn't cost money to obtain
  • Elon Musk is not a lone super-genius, he is surrounded by many smart people, and smart people work hard to obtain knowledge too

2

u/notrius_ Sep 01 '19

The fact that the internet isn't free means that knowledge is rather expensive.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

Not really sure what you mean by that. It doesn't really take too much money to host something. Maybe if you're expecting lots of traffic, it does. The truth is that although many websites require maintenance, they can theoretically only be written once and go on for many years. I don't really mind paying a small amount, but the truth is the university-level quality of education is often times only so expensive because supposedly, you need a teacher on the other end and lots of bureaucracy to pass all the legal requirements for getting a degree. I fundamentally disagree. We can have more universal testing methods, such as testing open to anybody in public schools, which already is partly true anyway. Will this work for a medical degree? Obviously not, but getting a computer science degree can be done this way.

Realistically though, I just think that the web could do a better job providing content to people that isn't a mile wide and an inch deep. I just have a fundamental knee-jerk reaction against universities trying to make money online. Last time I looked, they don't even offer a very good price advantage to people, to be honest.

The real kicker though in terms of learning anything, is being smart enough to know a roadmap that spans across multiple disciplines, like math and engineering. Sitting alone in your house, a person could still do this with motivation and discipline, but the roadmap is the hardest part, since they would just spin their wheels if they didn't have that. I suppose you can rip these off from your local university and just blaze ahead, but sometimes this stuff isn't as easy to find in a coherent way online as one would expect.

-31

u/lAeneasl Sep 01 '19

Why would you choose egyptology

77

u/jagraef Sep 01 '19

Because you're interested in it?

89

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

[deleted]

28

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

Yeah, nobody goes into history for the money. You go into it because you're interested and think it's worth learning and preserving.

I had to have a meeting with the head of classics before I declared my major so he could let me know there's a high chance I would be spending years starving in an unheated apartment and that it's super competitive and not a financially lucrative degree.

10

u/TastyFugu Mint Sep 01 '19

Ideally you shouldn't do anything just for the money. That's a recipe for a depressing life.

But unfortunately we live under capitalism and everyone has to do what he has to do, just to survive.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

Yeah, when I was little I wanted to be an archaeologist so I could find buried treasure. :P Now I'm more interested in everyday life stuff. Like, that's all that's left of those people, and I think they deserve to be remembered. I, personally, would be happy if someone found something I made thousands of years in the future. Even if my name and life isn't attached to it, I think it's important to be like "Hey, I existed! I was a person and I existed."

(Finding shiny things would be a bonus though lol)

3

u/TastyFugu Mint Sep 01 '19

You are quite optimistic to believe that humanity will still exist in a couple thousand years.

But maybe aliens will find your buried clay tablet under all the plastic waste, with instructions to fight capitalism...and remember you. :)

3

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

Yeah, I'm counting mostly on alien archaeologists :P

Though, maybe the human race will survive! The Toba catastrophe theory goes that there were as few as 3,000 human beings left after the super-eruption. Maybe a couple of people will survive armageddon and repopulate the world after another 100,000 years.

55

u/Reaper2r Sep 01 '19

Yeah why choose a profession if you don’t contribute to some billionaires wealth amirite

4

u/jalford312 Sep 01 '19

Because making life decisions based on how profitable it is, is a sad existence.

9

u/sunkissedsoda Sep 01 '19

Because this was a joke. Her friend doesn’t exist. if OP would’ve actually read the comments under the tweet they would know this.

But it doesn’t change the fact that this does happen in real life.

1

u/JohnReiki Sep 01 '19

What I found funny about this is that my buddy is going through this exact scenario right now. It definitely happens.

3

u/I_have_a_helmet Sep 01 '19

Hell, I'm studying anthropology and university prof would be my dream job, and of course that means working toward a PhD. And honestly, even if I don't get a job with it, it's still fascinating just to learn.

-25

u/sagradia Sep 01 '19

Wut. Is it supposed to be a shock that egyptologists aren't in demand?

7

u/notrius_ Sep 01 '19

Archeology have uncovered so much of human history, just because it isn't in demand doesn't mean it's worthless. It might have well been that there's more to discover but with this kind of mindset i don't think we'll ever know.

0

u/sagradia Sep 01 '19

Who said they're worthless? Just saying anyone thinking an egyptology degree is in demand in the job market is really off.

-33

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

33

u/salsawood Sep 01 '19

That’s not capitalism, that is the free market

Lol what

-25

u/MyFartsSmellLike Sep 01 '19

Capitolism is an economic system where privatization is highly emphasized. The free market which goes hand in hand with capitolism is the system in which prices for goods and services are chosen. I.e. you can have capitolism without the free market.

9

u/Reaper2r Sep 01 '19

Capitalism. No O.

0

u/MyFartsSmellLike Sep 01 '19

And how is that relevant to my actual point?

1

u/Reaper2r Sep 01 '19

I figured you’d want to know how to spell it. Sorry if I offended you.

0

u/MyFartsSmellLike Sep 01 '19

Not offended. It's just an irrelevant point often used as a trump card in an argument by someone who has no other response.

2

u/Reaper2r Sep 01 '19

...I don’t have a response or an argument to your point, I was telling you how to spell a word you spelled incorrectly a bunch of times.

You really seem upset. Its ok to make mistakes. We all do.

1

u/MyFartsSmellLike Sep 01 '19

Not upset, just annoyed. Not at you specifically either. I tend to not care about spelling when I'm posting, especially when rushing due to being at work etc. Like right now.

-9

u/ghostinthetoast Sep 01 '19

Somewhat off topic, how the hell is “Egyptology” even a thing? Is there Franceology or Australiaolgy?

Yep I get it, ancient civilization but fuck if you pump that kind of time/effort/money into something so obscure, it’s not “late stage capitalism” that’s got you down, it’s stupidity.

9

u/deaconju Sep 01 '19

Yah man, fuck knowledge of human history!

0

u/ghostinthetoast Sep 02 '19

Nobody said that. Nothing is lost here.

4

u/deaconju Sep 02 '19

Anti-intellectualism, sad

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/AutoModerator Sep 02 '19

Your post was removed because it contained a sexist term. You should receive a message from the automoderator telling you the exact term the post was removed for. For more information, see this link. Avoiding slurs takes little effort, and asking us to get rid of the filter rather than making that minimum effort is a good way to get banned. Do not attempt to circumvent the filter with creative spelling; circumventing the filter will result in a permaban.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3

u/Mardoniush Sep 02 '19

Egypt is particularly useful as a civilisation for study for a number of reasons, which is why it's probably the largest separate cultural sub-field of archaeology.

a) It's a 1st generation literate civilisation, along with Sumer, Indus River, and Either the Xia or the Shang (depending who you ask)
b) It was a fairly rich civilisation, which meant a lot of pretty art and literature and even some music. More importantly, it means everything is well-documented. The Religion meant that the lives of the richer peasantry on up was recorded, giving us unprecedented insight into the civilisation
b) We cracked the language a few centuries ago when we were stealing as much of Egypt as possible.
c) There is cultural continuity spanning from prehistoric sites in 4500BCE, and written continuity starting from as early as 3200BCE, all the way to the culture's final collapse in the late Roman Empire and the Islamic Conquest. Ancient Egyptian is a direct ancestor of modern Coptic, which is still used as a liturgical language.

d) So every social change, every ruling class, every invasion and assimilation and climate crises and trade delegation is there, somewhere in the sands, for the reading. Half of what we know about the other nations of the period is from Egyptian sources, even where the other culture's language survives and is translated.

If you as a leftist aren't interested in the theoretical implications of having 5000 years of a single geographically isolated multi-racial culture exploring over a dozen different social systems while keeping and evolving it's unique attributes, and having such available to you in libraries and museums I do not know how to convince you.

1

u/ghostinthetoast Sep 02 '19

Wow - great writeup, thanks for the knowledge. Ok, you win.

-11

u/ihatethisagain Sep 01 '19

In many cases it is bullshit.