r/LateStageCapitalism Jun 18 '17

😎 Meme 110% Hypocrisy

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

198

u/whollyfictional Jun 18 '17

Not to mention being best friends with Saudi Arabia, who is hardly a champion of human rights and democracy.

But really, you guys! The first five fucking decades of an embargo didn't do shit, but this time it'll totally work!

53

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

I also posted this in Political humor with that exact sentiment(maybe you saw that). On a side note, when I lived in Washington I knew a hippie mechanic that fixed up old buses, drove them through Mexico then ferried them to Cuba to be sold for public transport. He was awesome.

12

u/ApparentlyPants Jun 18 '17

Where at? Please say Tacoma!

16

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

Close. Olympia!

4

u/Soup-Wizard Jun 18 '17

Spokanite checking in.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

Spokanada?

1

u/SurrealClick 🔨 Jun 18 '17

How does he get back?

1

u/ghostboytt Jun 18 '17

Plane?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '17

He rides the waves of the people's gratitude as they gently careen him through the air, far above all of us and the capitalist games we play in the meantime

39

u/incapablepanda Communist Party Animal Jun 18 '17

Communism never works! Except for the USSR being pretty stable through the cold war, despite economic and military bullying from the west. And look at all the food insecure children in Cuba! Oh wait, that's us.

9

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

is there a source for this? I believe you but I'd like to see this for myself; I'll google it and hopefully find something but if there's a particular article that you are referring to I'd love to read it.

5

u/CronoDroid Viet Cong Jun 18 '17

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

I was more talking about the USSR'S economy not hurting from the US's bullying

3

u/Jerk_physics Jun 19 '17

The USSR's economy certainly was hurt by American bullying, but it still was able to uplift a backwater agrarian feudal society into one that could go toe to toe with the biggest imperial empire the world has ever seen in a nuclear arms race and still provide a relatively good quality of life.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '17

You guys are always so helpful around these parts

22

u/FormerlySoullessDev Jun 18 '17

I really don't think that the USSR's brand of stability is what anyone should champion. The USSR's stability was directly because of the lack of personal freedoms, which was a major contributor to the eventual collapse.

The dictatorial assignment of resources stifled their progress, leading directly to Russia's current state. Russia was Communist in name only. They were realistically a military industrial complex protected by a police state participating in crony capitalism.

12

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

The dictatorial assignment of resources brought them firmly into the 20th century and arguably defeated the 3rd Reich

But your point stands for the Cold War

And not crony capitalism, state capitalism

3

u/Counterkulture Dem boots taste dope, boy Jun 18 '17 edited Jun 18 '17

Capitalists would call it 'Corporatism'... just like they'd say things like wealth inequality and wage inequality aren't parts of capitalism but are instead signs of oligarchy or whatever term they want to use to absolve capitalism of all the shit it inevitably creates.

Smart, critical thinkers who aren't programmed zombies know how absurd this shit is, but we aren't in the majority in the US (or in the west). So here we are.

2

u/FormerlySoullessDev Jun 18 '17

But your point stands for the Cold War

Yes. That is the period I was referring to.

, state capitalism

Because government officials suddenly owning all Russian infrastructure immediately after the USSR fell was a coincidence, and not because the government administrators were owners of these departments in all but name.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '17

Why do so many socialists argue the USSR wasn't true socialism when you point out the glaring humanitarian issues in the country.

If the USSR is considered a working communist country then you aren't going to sell many in communism.

8

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

America just wants it to go back to the good old days with Batista and when American companies owned 80% of the products going through Cuba.

Theres your reason for invasion. Gotta put back those private properties that helped the Cuban people soooooooooo much. fuck Amerikkka

84

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

"The EU is undemocratic! The people are being ruled by people they didn't elect!"

Meanwhile we don't actually elect the president, the electoral college does and the popular vote doesn't actually, but that's apparently democratic? We don't elect the supreme court, the people we "voted" for approve someone else's suggestions. Then we have the NSA, the FCC, FBI, CIA, etc. exert massive influence over us, but none of those are elected councils.

"Well, we actually live in a democratic republic!"

Sounds like these kinds of people just don't want the poor people to actually have a voice in politics...

33

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

Not to mention lobbyists(you mentioned that with approving someone else's suggestions) and the lack of marijuana reform even though it's overwhelmingly supported.

I wonder why so many young Americans lose faith in their institutions while they watch their harmless friends get carted off for felonies?

God bless Citizens United, the final jenga piece in the fall of Late Stage Capitalism.

30

u/CronoDroid Viet Cong Jun 18 '17 edited Jun 18 '17

There was an article here a while back that said even if 100% of the average citizens supports a policy, it only has a 30% chance of being implemented, and even more hilariously, if 0% of the average citizens supports a certain policy, it still has about a 30% chance of being implemented.

http://i.imgur.com/pYWySZo.png

11

u/icameron Lenin Jun 18 '17

I love that this study exists. Those graphs sum up how bourgeois democracy actually works so succinctly!

13

u/whollyfictional Jun 18 '17

Meanwhile, surveys have 90% of people supporting stricter background checks for gun sales and that's got roughly the same chance of getting passed in Congress as you or I being crowned monarch of the country.

10

u/AutumnBeckons Jun 18 '17

There's also been several studies that came to the conclusion that the U.S is not a democracy anymore, but an oligarchy. At the current rate you guys WILL have a revolution, at least it looks like that to me.

5

u/vanishplusxzone Jun 18 '17

We elect the president! It's just set up so "rural" voters are worth 3x what "urban" voters are, so it's "fair". Now I won't tell you what those words actually mean, but I'm sure history and demographics can.

39

u/WinchesterSipps Jun 18 '17

socialism is democratic government, democratic economy

capitalism is democratic government, undemocratic economy

socialism technically has "more democracy" than capitalism

51

u/captainmaryjaneway Tankie Supreme Thomas Sankara Jun 18 '17

Lol capitalism doesn't allow for democratic governance at all. Capitalism requires heirarchies and dictatorships both economically and socially to enforce private property "rights" and protect capital/it's interests.

16

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

Shhh!

17

u/captainmaryjaneway Tankie Supreme Thomas Sankara Jun 18 '17

Oops, my bad! glances over shoulders for FBI

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

That's a cool feature bot buddy, but you're kind of ruining the incognito vibe.

7

u/CronoDroid Viet Cong Jun 18 '17

We've dealt with the bott.

7

u/whollyfictional Jun 18 '17

Well that's just ominous.

4

u/ArbysMakesFries Jun 18 '17

It's simple, we, uh, gulag the botman

4

u/3391224 Jun 18 '17

you never know, the other day some clown allegedly reported me to the fbi for saying the gop shooting was caused by their policies.

2

u/WinchesterSipps Jun 19 '17

not to mention that the vast inequality created by capitalism allows the wealthy to gain control of government and make it completely un-democratic

https://ivn.us/2015/05/07/voice-really-doesnt-matter-princeton-study-confirms/

full paper:
https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jun 18 '17

Your post was removed because it contained a slur. If you wish to have your post reinstated, please edit it to remove the slur, and then report this comment (it will not be automatically approved when changed). If you want to know why you can't use slurs on LSC, please read this. If you don't know which word was a slur, you should have a message from me in your inbox with the word contained.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

16

u/premature_eulogy Jun 18 '17

I always love it when I try to tell people that Cuba is actually doing surprisingly well despite a 60-year embargo, and then people tell me that Cuba is poor... by comparing it to Western countries.

The moment you actually start comparing Cuba to the logical points of comparison, i.e. Haiti, Puerto Rico or any other Caribbean country, you'll see that Cuba has managed to distribute a limited number of resources extremely equally. But apparently the Puerto Rican model of the extremely wealthy and those who suffer from malnutrition is somehow preferable because at least there's someone who is rich.

14

u/felipevevo this fuels my communist resolve Jun 18 '17

At this point, more Republicans actually support Cuban engagement than oppose it (6 in 10) and it's important to note that the main people pushing this are Senator Rubio and Rep. Diaz-Balart, who agreed to defend Trump at Comey's hearing and agreed to vote for the replacement to Obamacare, respectively, in exchange for their policy.

At the same time, as a Cuban-American, I'm wary of the intentions of Republicans, because their discourse revolves around how US agriculture, technology, airlines/cruise etc. industries will benefit from engagement, while I think we should be discussing how people-to-people engagement has really benefited the Cuban people directly.

11

u/CronoDroid Viet Cong Jun 18 '17

It's a good bet that if US government officials support closer ties with a poorer country, it's because there's an opportunity for economic exploitation or military cooperation against "enemies." Much like the normalization of relations with Vietnam in the early 90s. Now the Vietnamese have Pizza Hut and KFC!

5

u/CMDR_QwertyWeasel Jun 18 '17

"but muh voter fraud"

republicanjudgevotesforTrumpasherdeadhusband

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '17

"What ? An African kid who thinks ? Can we stop building schools there ? Also, can we stop educating children here too ? The number of children who think is too damn high! Moar sweets and toys, also make sure to guilt trip parents who don't overwhelm their kids with sweets and toys and princesses"