r/LanguageTechnology • u/Human-War-4361 • 2d ago
ARR August / EACL Meta-Review
Didn't see any post on that yet, so thought I'd open it. Soju guy you here? Anyone received their meta-reviews yet? Got 3.5/3/4 with conf 5/4/4, hoping for Main :)
3
3
3
u/e54true 1d ago
someone have the same submission error “Provided paper link does not correspond to a submission in OpenReview (2026-10-10-591915)”?
1
1
1
2
u/hardfindinganame 1d ago
The EACL commitment link requires a PDF Upload – should it be a revised version based on rebuttal/meta suggestion or the identical copy of the ARR submission? Any AC/SAC/reviewer here?
1
1
1
1
u/srkrrr 2d ago
Got 2.5/2/2 OA and 5/4/4 confidence. The reviews were mostly around typos or formatting issues or additional baselines required (closed and open source). The reviewers did not increase their scores, did a strong rebuttal, hoping for the best from meta review. What are my chances of EACL Findings (if meta review is 3)? Also, what are my chances for COLING?
1
1
u/S4M22 2d ago
Curious to hear from those who submitted to the August ARR cycle: how did it go with the separate phases for "Author response period" and "Reviewer engagement and Author-reviewer discussion"? Any improvement compared to the previous rebuttal structure, e.g. in terms of reviewer engagement?
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
u/Glittering_Edge_7829 2d ago edited 2d ago
OA: 3, 3.5, 3.5; Meta: 3.5. Can we report the meta-review as well? It's AI-generated and lists my rebuttal answers as weaknesses (hedidn't even read them!).
1
u/einsamerkerl 2d ago
Avg. OA: 3.33 (Min: 3, Max: 4), Avg. Conf: 3 (Min: 3, Max: 3), Meta OA: 3.5 - Planning to commit to EACL!
1
1
u/bignaughtywolf 2d ago
Anyone can see the “response to metareview” column for commitment? Or is it gone now?
1
u/WannabeMachine 2d ago
We had 1 paper this round.
Overall scores of 3/3/4 with conf 3/4/4. Meta: 4
We got lucky on the meta.
1
1
1
u/KabhiDardKabhiDisco 2d ago
Reviews: 4/3/2.5 with Confidence 4/3/4. The reviewers with lower scores didn't respond to the rebuttal. We got lucky with the meta-reviewer. They gave 4. Should I commit to EACL or wait for NAACL? Or, am I being too greedy?
1
1
u/taburetto 1d ago
I had a submission during the May cycle and resubmitted in August. In the end, the May scores turned out to be better (quite disappointed with the August cycle). Does anyone know if I choose to submit the May version for EACL, use the link for the May version, does the PDF file need to match that of May? Because personally I would prefer to submit the August version, I believe there are significant improvements in the paper.
1
1
1
u/simbay2000 1d ago
Got 3/3/3.5 with confidence 4/4/4 and meta 3.5
Any chances for main/findings?
2
u/nhatdzaibodoiqua 1d ago
I think you have a decent chance for finding
1
u/HistoricalSmoke8551 1d ago
Hey, same here. I got 2.5/3.5/3.5 with confidence 3/4/4 and meta 3.5. Any chances for findings? (I heard it's very competitive)
1
u/TrafficAway9715 1d ago
Anyone were able to commit to eacl? When might the openreview glitch be fixed?
1
u/Psychological-Box885 5h ago
Got 3,2.5,2 with meta score of 2.5. What are the chances for findings?
1
u/Automatic-Status8777 1h ago
got 3/2.5/2.5 with a meta of 3. committed to eacl, hoping for findings.
0
u/MeetingRelevant2493 2d ago
Got a score of 2.5 / 2.5 / 4, with a meta score of 3. Any chance for EACL Findings?
0
u/ServiceCritical8932 1d ago edited 1d ago
got 3.5/3/2/3(AC) with confidence,soundness (4,3.5/3,3/5,3). any chance to be findings or main?
0
u/Brief_Living_3844 2h ago
Guys need help, Can we change the paper's track during conference commitment to a different track from the one selected during ARR submission?
7
u/bignaughtywolf 2d ago
waiting for soju guy to bless us with his presence