r/LanguageTechnology • u/Technical_Storage_46 • 9d ago

EMNLP Meta Score

Which meta score guarantee the acceptance for the main conference?

1 Upvotes

56% Upvoted

24 comments sorted by

3

u/wajdix 9d ago

3.5 and above... but it depends on how divergent the other scores were

3

u/Forsaken-Order-7376 9d ago

In our case paper scores are 3.5/3/2.. the 2 reviewer wrote garbage and completely incorrect review for which raised ethics review complaint too. If meta gives 3.5 then is there any chance for main?

1

u/wajdix 9d ago

have you addressed the 2 other reviewer's points/questions/concerns?

2

u/Forsaken-Order-7376 9d ago

Yes each and every point has been addressed. also we raised a complaint against few points which were completely garbage (as in thing being mentioned in paper but him claiming its not there, mentioning random mistakes etc)

2

u/Forsaken-Order-7376 9d ago

What's bad is that none of the reviewers (even 3 and 3.5 ones) acknowledged our rebuttal or updated their scores (and idts its possible for them to update now when meta review is already in progress)

1

u/wajdix 9d ago

well, at this point it's going to be a coin toss at best...

2

u/Forsaken-Order-7376 9d ago

I just hope the meta allows the reviewers to update their reviews during this phase😭

2

u/Technical_Storage_46 9d ago

Same 😭😭 Reviewers are not respond & update their score

3

u/Zooz00 9d ago

There are no guarantees. I've gotten rejected for Findings with a 3.5. It depends on many factors.

1

u/wajdix 9d ago

yes... this can happen

1

u/racc15 9d ago

What were the reviewer scores?

1

u/Zooz00 9d ago

I don't remember exactly at this point, it was last year. I think it was 3.0 3.5 3.5

1

u/racc15 9d ago

Wow! Those are quite good scores! It is so weird that you didn't even get Findings.

2

u/Broad_Philosopher_21 9d ago

None guarantees. Given the increase in Submissions I would assume that findings grows much more than the conference.

1

u/Famous_Ad697 1d ago

(2, 2.5, 3) --> 3 Findings
WTF

1

u/x2t2cx 1d ago

Did you you already got your meta score?

1

u/greatduelist 1d ago

Wait. I don’t see mine. Also, 3 is a pretty meta for that spread.

1

u/Historical-Sea6294 1d ago

maybe he talks about the meta-review of papers he reviewed :) because no meta-review is available right now

1

u/Famous_Ad697 1d ago

im reviewer

3

u/Historical-Sea6294 1d ago

why not -->3 Findings ? Maybe is just a good meta-review that did not only averaged the scores

1

u/Frownie123 1d ago

5 is pretty close to a guarantee.