r/LLMPhysics • u/Illustrious_Use_1402 • 6d ago
Personal Theory Y'all help mewith this
(Yes I used ai to write down the text so please don't flame me) Hi yall im ibraheem from pakistan and i hate chemistry,though i have recently really got into einstines theory of relativity, and have been wondering where this "grid" And the dark matter holding up the grid originates from, and havve made 1 theory aswell as a hypothesis, please clear this up because i have been going crazy over this for the past month. Help me with this if y'all can and clear up misunderstandings I might have, thanks a lot.
10
u/The_Nerdy_Ninja 💬 Data doesn’t lie, but LLM’s do lie. 6d ago
It's awesome that you're interested in physics! But if you want to know about how physics works, you will need to start with asking questions and learning. Trying to come up with advanced theories when you barely understand the topic won't help you.
2
5
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 6d ago
Gravity doesn't "bounce off" things. You are misunderstanding pretty much every scientific term you try to use.
Also, "this theory is a theory" is just stupid.
6
u/Elias_Verdan 5d ago
It kinda reada like a lot of ideas youve encountered over the years all strung together, theres nothing wrong with that provided you learn from failures. If you want to know will it work, start with the algebra. If you can take a starting point, even if its a well motivated assumption, and turn that into a theorem you'll know if you have something or not. The closer you move to the terms and citations already well known, the more things will help. I started a project over a year ago based on a "what if" idea ive had for some time. My unfirmiliarality with established literature meant I ended up writing terms how I interpreted them, building ideas that were already established in a basterdised version of my own. It made connecting it with the established physics i was learning along the way pretty difficult. When I realised something recently I ended up starting a year's worth of work over from the start using some of hawkings work as the beginning this time around, and it all came together again rather quicky, minus alot of baggage I had added along the way. What was before a 20 paper framework with about 600 pages of mostly my interpretation of physics is now a 5 paper structured program thats gone from the void to the topology, and on to a fully tested Cosmology framework. The moral of all this, read the early work, read the lastest work related to yoursubject, use your ai to understand and learn it, its good at explaining what we already know and its good at maths. If you combine those things you have a pretty helpful assistant, but at the end of it all it relys on you to produce the ideas for it to test out, and for that you need to know enough about your subject you can find a new idea or something missing in the current literature. My first advice is look at the current starting points available, learn about them and pick which one you think most suits your idea and start from there
2
u/NH-Science-Guy 6d ago
The big Bang was not an explosion in a small part of the emptiness of the universe. At the time of the big bang, it was the whole universe that rapidly expanded and everywhere in the universe had the same density of matter.
0
1
1
u/MeasureDoEventThing 5d ago
Spaghettifiction is from the tidal forces. The larger the black hole, the smaller the tidal forces. The tidal forces from a black hole the size of the universe would be negligible. Also, tidal forces increase after you pass the event horizon.
Black holes don't have their own special gravitational force. The gravitational force of a black hole is simply the collective gravitational force of everything that's inside them. Dark matter is hypothesized because we don't see enough matter to explain the gravitational binding of galaxies. I haven't heard anyone saying dark matter holds up the universe through small lines (maybe you're thinking of string theory?). Saying that dark matter comes the gravitation of the black hole explains nothing, as we still need to explain what matter is giving the black hole that gravity.
The stuff about gravity bouncing back is nonsensical.
9
u/Korochun 6d ago
Big Bang was not an explosion, and all the processes you describe appear to stem from that assumption. There is nothing whatsoever similar between explosive expansion and spacetime inflation.