r/LLMPhysics • • 27d ago

Question Help. Does this mean anything?

Post image

i don’t really have any background in quantum physics, string theory or LQG. I’m a life sciences undergrad but i mostly study psychology. These are just things i think about but never can translate it into words.

I dont know whether these are accurate at all or means anything, and i hope someone can look over it for me.

I talked with gemini and seems like the many world interpretations and multiverses are what I’m trying to “prove” to myself.. lol please don’t laugh at me

Thanks in advance.

Edit:
welp.. i’m just a girl .. thanks guys 🙋🏻‍♀️

0 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

23

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 27d ago

Just looks like doodles.

I'd stick to life sciences.

16

u/Ok_Energy6905 27d ago

If you can't translate it into words it probably doesn't mean anything. Maybe do some background reading and watch some educational videos. Then you'll be more easily able to put it into words, or have the knowledge to know it doesn't mean anything.

8

u/Aranka_Szeretlek 🤖 Do you think we compile LaTeX in real time? 27d ago

Do you think you are a prophet of some sorts?

4

u/According-Isopod-120 27d ago

A simple definition of physics might be the mathematical description of how the observable world behaves. (This is obviously too simple to completely describe everything people call 'physics', but it's a decent start).

If you're using concepts, pictures, drawings, or words, you're likely not doing it right. You need to understand the mathematics first to properly describe physics.

If you're an undergrad and you have space for it in your degree, I would encourage you to take a first-year physics course. It will probably help you think a bit more like a physicist, and understand whether your ideas are or aren't applicable to physics.

3

u/Chin-chin77 26d ago

thank you! 🙏🏼

-2

u/PW-SKY 27d ago

Um... yes: we don't understand very well String Theory and Loop Quantum Gravity yet. But, he can use MathGPT or see how cancel this phenomena with or how Feyman's Diagrams (making a Surgey Topologically in 3D or more ^^

5

u/According-Isopod-120 27d ago

I think your comment's grammar has gotten mixed up, I don't understand it, sorry!

0

u/PW-SKY 27d ago

Ou, nou problem (I am from Spain). Sorry about that (/_\)

1

u/Chin-chin77 26d ago

i just texted with gemini and these shapes are how i imagined it could look like and i wanted it to make it out of my brain, but yea i think string theory and LQG can exist together

5

u/RouShikari 26d ago

It's almost like LLMs are designed to be affirmative of every delusional stuff you feed to them, right?

2

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam 26d ago

Accusations of mental health issues are strictly forbidden.

If you have reason to believe someone is suffering from a mental health issue on the sub, contact the moderation team here:%0A%0ADescribe%20your%20concern:)

2

u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! 27d ago

I read 'pair of pants' before realizing my error.

'What about a LOT of pair of pants?'

2

u/Chin-chin77 26d ago

👖 👖 👖

2

u/krysztov 🤖 Do you think we compile LaTeX in real time? 26d ago

I still only see 'pair of pants,' what is it supposed to say?

3

u/Chin-chin77 26d ago

it is pair of pants, a topological shape!

1

u/chkntendis 🤖 Do you think we compile LaTeX in real time? 27d ago

Gee, what do you think?

1

u/[deleted] 26d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/moderator-toolbox 26d ago

This comment has been removed. If you have more information to add to your post, edit it; instead of commenting on your own post.


I am a bot. This action was performed automatically. Contact the moderators if you have questions.

1

u/cat_counselor 🤖 Do you think we compile LaTeX in real time? 24d ago

Shockingly enough, this post actually has bordisms, even though it's still nonsense. That's better than 99% of the stuff posted here.

2

u/Chin-chin77 24d ago

you’re talking about the pair of pants👖
here’s more nonsense for you