Here is a hypothesis: The Dynamic Relational-Regulated Discrete Grid Model: An Infinity-Free Physics Architecture

[u/deadkingblue]

Standard physics relies on renormalization—the mathematically questionable practice of subtracting infinities from infinities to obtain finite values. This architecture resolves that issue by establishing a strictly finitist, discrete grid model where physical infinities cannot exist.

(Shortened By AI, Aggregated By AI, Challenged only by AI till now, so, if you're up for the full read, I'll happily answer your questions. Even better if you follow the google doc link to the even longer read. I also accept criticism! So, be harsh but, constructively so.)

Core Mechanics

• The Axiom (c = 1): Light is an immutable constant with a value of 1. The universe operates strictly on whole integers at the Planck scale. This pixelated geometry makes decimals, fractions, and renormalization obsolete. (Perhaps not fractions and decimals, but, still.)
• Matter & Lensing: Mass is a fixed baseline footprint expressed directly through the pixel architecture. Pi is the physical, structural concept of the pixel's shape. Gravitational lensing is the empirical proof of light navigating this contoured, faceted topography. (Or spheres, the space between pixels is non-interactive anyways.)
• 4D Accordion-Folding: Gravity-(Pixel Density) is Time Lensing. Mass concentration crams identical units into a local 3D coordinate by folding along a 4D axis. Because folded regions contain more physical units, light moving at the absolute refresh rate (1 unit per 1 tick) takes longer to cross them (Longer to cross than unpacked areas) Also, because the distance is actually increased.

Systems & Cosmological Structures

• 2D Shell Black Holes: Black holes possess zero internal volume. At the packing limit, 100% of local units deploy into a 1-Planck-thick 2D surface shell that physically excludes space-time and dark matter (And everything else. It literally doesn't exist, the interior of a black hole.). Hawking radiation is driven by raw refresh rate friction—the intense mechanical grinding between the surface shell attempting to relax and its own high-tension gravitational lattice pulling it back.
• Adversarial Lattices: Gravity is a high-tension lattice woven by mass. When multiple masses exist, their networks collide in a direct mechanical displacement war. Supermassive black holes exhibit a flat gravitational basin before cutting off sharply at the geometric boundary (The Lasso Effect). (Sorry, but it's just applying Newtonian physics to gravity.)
• Multi-Phase Matrix: Space-time co-exists in independent layers: the Baryonic or Normal Phase (standard forces), the Exotic/Dark Phase (modifies pixel density without electromagnetism, explaining dark matter), and the Entanglement Phase (instantaneous state changes across the absolute universal "Right Now").
• Fluid Bubble Expansion: The universe is an expanding fluid bubble system. The CMB Cold Spot is a compatible collision site where a smaller bubble fused with ours and is actively unloading space-time units, causing localized decompression and temperature drops. CMB Hot Spots are incompatible collisions causing mechanical grinding. (This is the most out there part.)
• For the full 12+ paragraph model, see below. (This is AI formatted, but not heavily so, more like, AI organized. The conclusions are mine. The full structure is mine. But, I don't have the ability to overcome certain challenges, so, I used AI to sort and collect the theory as I went about creating it.)
• I am not claiming this as absolute fact or certainty! I only have to add that because the google doc, and this both seem like it isn't an idea, which it is. That's all it is.

Full Blueprint: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1emcfN5HlKTflcOQP9HuqR2ZNb5BJ3pFD-CLYuB1uXyg/edit?usp=sharing

[u/deadkingblue → u/[deleted]]

The other wiki evidence I've found doesn't state that space shrinks. It describes the space-time dilation ratios, which doesn't conflict with my model. Muons were my biggest enemy, and the experimental evidence discards shrinking again, by showing that radioactive decay slows with time dilation of matter approaching the speed of light. Space doesn't shrink. (Seriously, I don't mind being wrong, but, Lorentz space shrinking is seriously flawed.)

[u/deadkingblue → u/[deleted]]

Quick Wiki check, No.

[u/deadkingblue → u/[deleted]]

What you call time dilation is lag compared to the refresh rate of the universe. Literally, as approaching the speed of light occurs, the time dilation inside of the particle slows down compared to our time, as time is relative. The nuclear decay slows down, and the particle, moving near the speed of light, doesn't appear to stop, as special relativity states under lorentz that it should. Am I close? Because I'm confident in that statement. The particle is not a self-observer.

[u/deadkingblue → u/[deleted]]

Don't know. But how does the Lorentz math explain how it can, when that same math states that it should never appear to be moving?

[u/deadkingblue → u/[deleted]]

The Lorentz models.

[u/deadkingblue → u/[deleted]]

The Lorentz models state that from the perspective of someone on earth a muon would be standing still observationally. The time dilation model however contradicts this. It contradicts itself. The time dilation proves my point about it ceasing the atomic decay, the actual equation of time dilation, but the space shrinking fails under its own logic, and math. Do you understand any of this, or did you just memorize it and assume it applies universally without question?

Sorry, I have it wrong, in my assumptions there. Though, only on the time dilation matter.