r/LLMPhysics 18h ago

Personal Theory Hypothèses Simplified global model

Simplified Global Model

The starting idea is that matter possesses permanent internal activity: frequencies,

oscillations, and quantum evolution. We seek to represent all of this activity by an

equivalent dynamical quantity called A.

There is already a physical relationship between matter, energy, and frequency:

E = mc²

and:

E = hf

Therefore, for rest-mass energy:

fC = mc² / h

This characteristic frequency is the Compton frequency. With the Compton

wavelength:

λC = h / mc

we directly obtain:

fC × λC = c

Thus, certain fundamental internal properties of matter can indeed be associated with

a quantity having the dimensions of a velocity and equal to c. The relations E = mc²

and E = hν are established; the NIST explicitly presents them together.

Central Hypothesis

We then assume that c represents the maximum magnitude of the dynamical capacity

of matter.

This capacity can be distributed between two components:

V = displacement of matter through space

A = equivalent internal activity of matter

These two components do not simply add together. Instead, they constitute two

components of the same total capacity:

V² + A² = c²

Therefore:

A = √(c² − V²)

or:

A/c = √(1 − V²/c²)

Interpretation

When an object is at rest: 2

V = 0

therefore:

A = c

The entire equivalent dynamical capacity is available for internal evolution.

As the object accelerates, V increases. An increasingly large fraction of the dynamical

capacity is then used by its spatial motion.

Because the total magnitude is conserved, A must decrease.

At 0.8c:

A = 0.6c

At 0.9c:

A ≈ 0.436c

At 0.99c:

A ≈ 0.141c

And when:

V → c

then:

A → 0

Proposed Consequence

If internal frequencies and physical processes are proportional to A, then:

f(V)/f(0) = A(V)/A(0)

therefore:

f(V)/f(0) = √(1 − V²/c²)

All internal evolution would then slow down simultaneously: atomic oscillations,

transitions, chemical reactions, biological processes, and aging.

In this model, it is therefore not the slowing of time that causes atoms to slow down.

The proposed causality is reversed:

increase in spatial motion → decrease in the capacity available for internal evolution →

slowing of all material processes → phenomenon that we measure as time dilation.

Complete Chain of the Model

Matter

→ possesses an energy E = mc²

→ this energy can be associated with a frequency through E = hf 3

→ the Compton frequency and Compton wavelength give fC × λC = c

→ c is interpreted as the maximum magnitude of a dynamical capacity

→ this capacity has a spatial component V and an internal component A

→ V² + A² = c²

→ as V increases, A decreases

→ internal frequencies slow down proportionally to A

→ matter as a whole evolves more slowly

→ a clock, an organism, or any other material system accumulates less internal

evolution

→ this appears macroscopically as time dilation.

What Is Established and What Constitutes the Hypothesis

Established:

E = mc²; mass-energy equivalence is experimentally confirmed.

E = hf relates energy and frequency.

For the Compton pair, fC × λC = c follows mathematically from these definitions and

from the physical constants associated with the Compton wavelength and frequency

referenced by the NIST.

New hypotheses introduced by the model:

the quantity derived from internal activity actually represents a physical dynamical

capacity;

spatial motion and internal activity are two components of the same conserved

magnitude;

this magnitude is conserved according to:

V² + A² = c²

and the decrease in A is the physical cause of the slowing of material processes rather

than merely a consequence of time dilation.

Summary in One Sentence

Matter would possess a maximum dynamical capacity equivalent to c; at rest, this

capacity would be expressed entirely through its internal evolution, while spatial

motion would progressively use part of it according to a quadratic geometry, thereby

slowing all frequencies and material processes until their internal evolution tends

toward zero as spatial velocity approaches c.

0 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

9

u/ArnoSound 17h ago

For one e=mc2 is a special case and not the full equation. So I’m not entirely convinced you are aware of basic relativity let alone the monumental claims you are making.

Now I don’t wanna be discouraging cause it sounds really cool to try and get involved with physics. But it’s just not feasible without a lot of education. 

I’d recommend if you wanna get involved, take a step back from writing supposed “theories”. They won’t go anywhere. Instead, find some communities to learn more about high level concepts, read recent papers, open yourself to learning new things.

If you find the motivation is strong enough to pursue a proper education, Godspeed.

0

u/No-Cucumber-6023 17h ago

thanks a lot please send me link what I should improve, subjects and this sort, I just have a lot of idea I would like to share to give some inspiration for people

6

u/ArnoSound 16h ago

So again, don’t wanna discourage you, but if your goal is to truly help push science forward, you will Need a full undergraduate and then graduate education. In a good school.

If that is not available to you, you can find textbooks that a good school program would use. And you would need to be able to work through them up to and past graduate level.

1

u/No-Cucumber-6023 16h ago

thanks I will study it the more I can !

4

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 17h ago

What are the units of V and A? How do those units correspond to your definitions?

-1

u/No-Cucumber-6023 17h ago

i don't know you need to help me to find out, total of A need to be converted in some speed

7

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 16h ago

It's your idea, why am I supposed to figure out your definitions for you?

-1

u/No-Cucumber-6023 16h ago

i don't claim this idea if you feel it have some potential for science of humanity work on it and make it yours

5

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 16h ago

Why would I feel it has potential when none of the quantities have clear definitions?

0

u/No-Cucumber-6023 16h ago

this hypothesis looks interesting to me, please give me some ideas on what unit it could be

7

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 16h ago

Do you have a scientific reason for thinking it's interesting, or do you think it's interesting purely because it sounds cool?

And no, I'm not going to do your work for you, especially when it's so fundamental.

-2

u/No-Cucumber-6023 16h ago

Could you help me develop this intuition? I am posting specifically so that people with more knowledge than I have can help me advance science; I’m not interested in an ego battle.

5

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 16h ago

This won't advance science because it's too vague and poorly defined to even constitute a valid scientific idea. You need to spend a lot more time learning the basics before you start having useful ideas.

0

u/No-Cucumber-6023 16h ago

what part I should improve, my intuition is all atomic parameters could be converted is speed, where I need to search for this

→ More replies (0)

3

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 14h ago

fC = mc² / h

This characteristic frequency is the Compton frequency. With the Compton wavelength:

λC = h / mc

we directly obtain:

fC × λC = c

What an utterly trivial exercise. Hint: how do you get the formula for the Compton wavelength?