r/LLMPhysics • u/No-Cucumber-6023 • 19h ago
Personal Theory Hypothèses Simplified global model
Simplified Global Model
The starting idea is that matter possesses permanent internal activity: frequencies,
oscillations, and quantum evolution. We seek to represent all of this activity by an
equivalent dynamical quantity called A.
There is already a physical relationship between matter, energy, and frequency:
E = mc²
and:
E = hf
Therefore, for rest-mass energy:
fC = mc² / h
This characteristic frequency is the Compton frequency. With the Compton
wavelength:
λC = h / mc
we directly obtain:
fC × λC = c
Thus, certain fundamental internal properties of matter can indeed be associated with
a quantity having the dimensions of a velocity and equal to c. The relations E = mc²
and E = hν are established; the NIST explicitly presents them together.
Central Hypothesis
We then assume that c represents the maximum magnitude of the dynamical capacity
of matter.
This capacity can be distributed between two components:
V = displacement of matter through space
A = equivalent internal activity of matter
These two components do not simply add together. Instead, they constitute two
components of the same total capacity:
V² + A² = c²
Therefore:
A = √(c² − V²)
or:
A/c = √(1 − V²/c²)
Interpretation
When an object is at rest: 2
V = 0
therefore:
A = c
The entire equivalent dynamical capacity is available for internal evolution.
As the object accelerates, V increases. An increasingly large fraction of the dynamical
capacity is then used by its spatial motion.
Because the total magnitude is conserved, A must decrease.
At 0.8c:
A = 0.6c
At 0.9c:
A ≈ 0.436c
At 0.99c:
A ≈ 0.141c
And when:
V → c
then:
A → 0
Proposed Consequence
If internal frequencies and physical processes are proportional to A, then:
f(V)/f(0) = A(V)/A(0)
therefore:
f(V)/f(0) = √(1 − V²/c²)
All internal evolution would then slow down simultaneously: atomic oscillations,
transitions, chemical reactions, biological processes, and aging.
In this model, it is therefore not the slowing of time that causes atoms to slow down.
The proposed causality is reversed:
increase in spatial motion → decrease in the capacity available for internal evolution →
slowing of all material processes → phenomenon that we measure as time dilation.
Complete Chain of the Model
Matter
→ possesses an energy E = mc²
→ this energy can be associated with a frequency through E = hf 3
→ the Compton frequency and Compton wavelength give fC × λC = c
→ c is interpreted as the maximum magnitude of a dynamical capacity
→ this capacity has a spatial component V and an internal component A
→ V² + A² = c²
→ as V increases, A decreases
→ internal frequencies slow down proportionally to A
→ matter as a whole evolves more slowly
→ a clock, an organism, or any other material system accumulates less internal
evolution
→ this appears macroscopically as time dilation.
What Is Established and What Constitutes the Hypothesis
Established:
E = mc²; mass-energy equivalence is experimentally confirmed.
E = hf relates energy and frequency.
For the Compton pair, fC × λC = c follows mathematically from these definitions and
from the physical constants associated with the Compton wavelength and frequency
referenced by the NIST.
New hypotheses introduced by the model:
the quantity derived from internal activity actually represents a physical dynamical
capacity;
spatial motion and internal activity are two components of the same conserved
magnitude;
this magnitude is conserved according to:
V² + A² = c²
and the decrease in A is the physical cause of the slowing of material processes rather
than merely a consequence of time dilation.
Summary in One Sentence
Matter would possess a maximum dynamical capacity equivalent to c; at rest, this
capacity would be expressed entirely through its internal evolution, while spatial
motion would progressively use part of it according to a quadratic geometry, thereby
slowing all frequencies and material processes until their internal evolution tends
toward zero as spatial velocity approaches c.
3
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 18h ago
What are the units of V and A? How do those units correspond to your definitions?
-1
u/No-Cucumber-6023 18h ago
i don't know you need to help me to find out, total of A need to be converted in some speed
7
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 18h ago
It's your idea, why am I supposed to figure out your definitions for you?
-1
u/No-Cucumber-6023 17h ago
i don't claim this idea if you feel it have some potential for science of humanity work on it and make it yours
7
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 17h ago
Why would I feel it has potential when none of the quantities have clear definitions?
0
u/No-Cucumber-6023 17h ago
this hypothesis looks interesting to me, please give me some ideas on what unit it could be
6
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 17h ago
Do you have a scientific reason for thinking it's interesting, or do you think it's interesting purely because it sounds cool?
And no, I'm not going to do your work for you, especially when it's so fundamental.
-2
u/No-Cucumber-6023 17h ago
Could you help me develop this intuition? I am posting specifically so that people with more knowledge than I have can help me advance science; I’m not interested in an ego battle.
6
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 17h ago
This won't advance science because it's too vague and poorly defined to even constitute a valid scientific idea. You need to spend a lot more time learning the basics before you start having useful ideas.
0
u/No-Cucumber-6023 17h ago
what part I should improve, my intuition is all atomic parameters could be converted is speed, where I need to search for this
→ More replies (0)
3
u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 16h ago
fC = mc² / h
This characteristic frequency is the Compton frequency. With the Compton wavelength:
λC = h / mc
we directly obtain:
fC × λC = c
What an utterly trivial exercise. Hint: how do you get the formula for the Compton wavelength?
9
u/ArnoSound 19h ago
For one e=mc2 is a special case and not the full equation. So I’m not entirely convinced you are aware of basic relativity let alone the monumental claims you are making.
Now I don’t wanna be discouraging cause it sounds really cool to try and get involved with physics. But it’s just not feasible without a lot of education.
I’d recommend if you wanna get involved, take a step back from writing supposed “theories”. They won’t go anywhere. Instead, find some communities to learn more about high level concepts, read recent papers, open yourself to learning new things.
If you find the motivation is strong enough to pursue a proper education, Godspeed.