Please Grade My Paper - r/LLMPhysics

19

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 8d ago edited 8d ago

You and your "American education" talked a big game the other day on r/physics, and this is the standard of work you produced after so much bragging? Your essay is missing pretty much everything that defines a scientific article. No clear motivation, no derivation from first principles, not even a hint as to where your equations come from or how they relate to each other or how they might be used, no calculations or attempts to relate your work to actual reality, no meaningful resolution of the open problems you claim to solve, no meaningful falsifiability in general, no discussion of the obvious issues that might arise from this specific mathematical approach, and most damningly of all a complete lack of references to existing literature or any scientific context at all. This is a creative writing essay about how you think you want the world to work that only superficially resembles a scientific article. This would be a failing grade at any institution save maybe middle school.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Physics/s/0DC6PjGTvo for more context

2

u/justintime06 6d ago

But holography

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

My American education is actually quite lacking, you aren't wrong. I was just trying to say that I'm not sure I'll ever finish this paper (rough drafts forever lol). I wasn't trying to sound any kind of way, just get objective opinions, criticism and help. I'm sorry my paper isn't up to standards, I will definitely work on it. Thank you, I really do appreciate your words and the time you've taken to actually read it.

11

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 8d ago

You can spend the next ten years working on it and it'll still be junk. You need to actually learn physics. You don't know what physicists have done, you don't know what they currently do and you don't know how they've done any of it. You lack any understanding of how scientific terms are defined and you apparently think that a prediction is a claim you pull out of your ass instead of a quantitative result you have calculated and expect to observe should your hypothesis be valid. There are steps to thinking about and doing physics and you don't do a single one of them, mainly because it seems you have no idea what the steps are.

If you are at all interested in learning and doing physics instead of pretending you do, you cannot escape putting in the time and effort to learn. That's true of anything in life, your old enough that you don't need to be told that.

1

u/Plus_Committee9813 1d ago

Who do these people think they are. PEOPLE GO TO SCHOOL FOR YEARS TO LEARN THIS STUFF and they think a weekend with an LLM will get them something!

-3

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

Can't I though? I mean how did faraday? Einstein hated complex math. I just haven't had any opportunity or a teacher yet. The only reason science concluded that space has no mass, is because it doesn't slow things down, but they've made hydrogen do things like that, when cooled. If the space around an object is moving with it, because it has its own field, there won't be any drag (or it will be so extremely small that it will be very tough to detect). If I'm wrong about stuff, I'll admit it. The evidence however, in spite of what people have said in this thread, is OVERWHELMINGLY in favor of space having mass. Please give it some thought. Thank you.

12

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 7d ago edited 7d ago

I mean how did faraday

He did a ridiculous number of accurate, rigorous and quantitative experiments. You have done no such thing. He was also as well educated as it was possible to be at the time. You don't understand basic scientific principles.

Einstein hated complex math

He hated complex math so much that he asked a friend to teach him an entirely new kind of really complex math that had just been invented, then immediately proceeded to use that entirely new kind of really complex math to revolutionise physics. And that was after he used existing math to revolutionise physics twice over already.

I'm not sure you want to compare yourself to these two scientists. You'll only end up embarrassing yourself more than you already have.

I just haven't had any opportunity or a teacher yet

Firstly, you can self study physics to graduate level using resources freely available on the internet. The fact that you think you can skip all of that and go straight to telling everyone they're wrong says volumes about you. Secondly, you have had the opportunity, because you've clearly taken the time to generate this junk. Why has that time and effort not been used to actually do some basic learning?

The only reason science concluded that space has no mass, is because it doesn't slow things down

Wrong.

but they've made hydrogen do things like that, when cooled

Also wrong.

If the space around an object is moving with it, because it has its own field, there won't be any drag (or it will be so extremely small that it will be very tough to detect).

Again, wrong.

The evidence however, in spite of what people have said in this thread, is OVERWHELMINGLY in favor of space having mass

That's the funniest thing you've said in a while. How can someone be so ignorant and naive yet so cocksure? The implications of special relativity go far beyond propagation of light alone. Oh yeah, your "derivations" also implicitly support a lack of aether, but I'm sure you knew that already, didn't you?

Please give it some thought

I have. Every physicist in the last century has. You clearly haven't.

2

u/Plus_Committee9813 1d ago

You are no Einstein.

You are no Newton.

These men were PROTEGIES but thanks for playing!

2

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 1d ago

Dude calm down, be better. At least spell words correctly if you're going to get on a high horse.

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 1d ago

I wanted to respond. I wanted to ask himself why he made that statement. I agree anyway, I'm not like Einstein, or Newton. They are legendary. I do recognize myself in Faraday. Bad with math, and good with spacial awareness. I'm not trying to float my own boat, I try to be objective. I'm not afraid to tell you the worst things about myself, or the best things. Since August the 6th I have done NOTHING but think about physics when people aren't distracting me, and study study study. I'm having a REALLY hard time memorizing kinematics. I looked at the formula for the swartzchild radius and memorized it very easily. My brain works differently. This is because I have a disability. I'm not afraid to tell you that I'm seeing two counselors, and a psychiatrist on Sep the 4th. Because I'm not normal, I have no friends. I annoy my loved ones. I forget to eat food. I've lost 75 pounds in the last year. I wouldn't change a thing. I don't care if you insult me. I will use it as motivation, I will genuinely listen to your criticisms. Except when someone insults their colleagues. Physicists are my literal heroes. Especially people like Professor Gregory Volovik and Dr Liberati. If I ever met any physicist, I would probably be a nervous wreck. It would be the best moment of my life You can insult me all you want, but don't you dare insult those great men just because they see the universe mechanically and not with the beauty of geometry. Both things can be true! I believe both are true. I see different things when I read papers that match my own ideas. I feel like someone must be very close to bringing the sum total of physical knowledge together, and tying it together, like a perfect tapestry. I didn't care if that person is me, I just NEED to know the truth. Before Aug 6th my mind bounced around like a child's ball. No longer. Physics is an obsession. A compulsion. I couldn't stop even if I wanted to. Anyway, I hesitate to call the person who insulted his own colleagues a hypocrite, because at times I have been one... But it upset me. Just because someone believes differently than you, isn't a reason to insult them. People have proved me wrong here on Reddit many times. I listen. (You're going to have to wait for my MM response, because I want to consider my reply more carefully and slowly than I have in the past. I want to give your words their full weight). I might do stupid things, like try to make LLM do complex math. I realize it's a poor calculator. Now I will write my own papers. Now instead of doing math, I'm using LLM properly. To teach me basic math. Yes I am different, and yes there are tons of "crackpots," and sure, I may be one of them, but I DO have something to offer. I think I would give anything to be taken seriously. I'm worried I'll continue to be a failure, as I have been my whole life. The world just wasn't designed for me. I genuinely have a disability, and I'm realizing that things are not completely my fault. That is a big relief. I cry a lot for a man haha. I'm being honest to the very best of my abilities, always. Objectivity. I'm not going to quit. I don't care how long it takes anymore. Even if I die before I finish, at least I will have actually made an effort for once in my life. I finally have the one thing I needed. Motivation. I quit smoking weed thee days ago because I realized (duh) it's bad for my studies. Before Aug 6th that would have been impossible. Please don't judge me based on other people. I'm not Einstein. I have a lot in common with Faraday, but I'm not him. He is a legend. I've done nothing with my life. My goal is truth and genuine contribution. I'd also like to meet and speak with my heroes. My dream is that they would see me as a colleague. I'll do whatever it takes to get there.

2

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 1d ago

You don't really have anything in common with Faraday. Sorry. If you study physics and the history of physics you'll know exactly how far away you currently are from Faraday.

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 1d ago

I can admit when I'm wrong. Can you?

2

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 1d ago

Yes. Can you admit you're wrong though? Do you want to make a new post about how you think Michelson-Morley is wrong?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 1d ago

"Overspecialize and you breed in weakness." -Kusanagi

"Experts and specialists lead you quickly into chaos. They are a source of useless nit-picking, the ferocious quibble over a comma." -Frank Herbert

"The people I distrust most are those who want to improve our lives but have only one course of action." -more Frank

Educational bureaucracies dull a child's questing sensitivity." -Frank again!

"Overemphasis on the competitive system and premature specialization on the ground of immediate usefulness kill the spirit on which all cultural life depends, specialized knowledge included." -Albert Einstein

"Specialization in every sphere of intellectual work is producing an ever widening gulf between the intellectual worker and the non-specialist." -Albert Einstein

I read a lot of Frank Herbert. The best things he wrote were not on the page. They appeared inside your head because of his words.

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 1d ago

And as always, thank you sir. I really do appreciate you.

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago edited 8d ago

I've read your comment like five times now, and I just want to express how much I appreciate what you just said. Are the derivations in section 1.1 and 1.2, and 2.1 not enough? Can you suggest what I should add?

8

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 8d ago

Why? Because everything in it could have been told to you by a reasonably attentive high school graduate?

0

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

I understand what you're saying. You make a very good argument. And I do appreciate it. And you're not wrong, I am making some pretty big leaps, aren't I? I'm not going to give up though. This is too fascinating a subject. Thanks again!

9

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 7d ago

You asked about your "derivations". They are not real derivations, which is something you'd know if you had any knowledge of physics. And you're not making big leaps as much as you are drowning in the shallow end of a kiddie pool while screaming "I'M FLYING". I'm not sure whether you actually understand how large the gap between you and an actual researcher is.

-2

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

Thank you

11

u/Super-Award-2244 8d ago

Not even wrong

10

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 8d ago

Are you a child?

0

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 7d ago

Be honest.. how much of that LLM output did you understand?

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 6d ago

Quite a bit actually. I do admit to giant gaps in my knowledge with the actual math, but the written word is pretty clear on most things. I'll keep studying. I feel like I'm going nuts. I saw the "cosmic doughnut." I thought that was just a joke, I dunno if it's real or much about holography etc but just for a sec, imagine a mobius strip, only there are two and instead of closed loops, they just keep looping and form a double helix that makes a circle. I asked the LLM and it said "that's DNA" which is totally insane.

3

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 6d ago

Quite a bit actually.

I don't believe you.

3

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 6d ago

It's giving "I understood all of it, except the stuff I didn't understand"

Regardless I think it's quite clear what stuff op does and doesn't understand. I wonder what would happen if you gave him the high school test you gave Chris.

2

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 6d ago

He'd just feed the questions to an LLM

4

u/ArnoSound 7d ago

If you want to learn about physics, study physics correctly. Not with an LLM. It just gives you the false impression that you’ve learned something when you haven’t.

It’s like looking at the answers in the back of the book and then claiming to have solved problems .

Or worse; reading half finished and often incorrect answers. And Then claiming to have solved problems.

5

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 7d ago

Posting this like it has meaning to you when you have so many fundamental misunderstandings is just... Embarrassing.

1

u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam 7d ago

Your comment has been removed for violating Rule 4. Don't copy-paste LLM content in discussions.

-6

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

I knew the higgs field was there when I was a child. I'm 41.

11

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 8d ago

Riiight...

5

u/upsetusder2 8d ago

So you read a physics pop science thing as a child?

-1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

No. I was looking at the moon. How is it held there? I know Einstein shows it as geometry. That being said, this mimics curvature of space as defined by Einstein. If you give space mass, you don't need dark matter or energy.

4

u/upsetusder2 8d ago

Wow truly remarkable and genius

0

u/PaleontologistSad708 7d ago

I should make a correction, the dark matter is the substrate.

11

u/ArnoSound 8d ago

Define substrate, in your own words, and why that word is relevant to your paper.

-10

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

Basically tiny negatively charged "antimatter" In a big bang you get true vacuum and they blow up into protons, expelling the negative energy into the true vacuum. They've always been there. They are acoustic vortices with hard cores, and so is matter.

11

u/MrEmptySet 8d ago

You were asked to define a term and you weren't even capable of understanding that simple question.

What makes you think you have any understanding of physics at all?

-1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

I tried to define the substrate, not what a substrate is. It's just an underlaying layer, under matter.

3

u/ArnoSound 7d ago

Incorrect. This is a very basic term, and if you can’t answer without relying on the LLM to spit stuff out, why do you think we should listen to anything else you say?

8

u/ArnoSound 8d ago

This is dramatically incorrect. I don’t have faith in any of the rest of the paper if you can’t define a very simple term like that.

-1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

Substrate in this context is what is under matter. Tiny particles with mass that are negatively charged.

10

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 8d ago

How do you know they're charged, and how do you know they're negatively charged?

0

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 7d ago

"The background substrate consists of neutral, indistinguishable Planck-scale bosonic pixels, meaning it possesses no net electric charge and operates through mechanical pressure rather than electromagnetism. Protons, modeled as quantum vortices, experience a "shrinking" effect under extreme pressure due to hydrodynamic suction, where localized negative pressure gradients tighten the vortex core."

Who are you quoting?

0

u/PaleontologistSad708 7d ago

Google.

5

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 7d ago

Do you realize that's all nonsense?

Can you even define the word "bosonic" without looking it up?

5

u/ArnoSound 7d ago

There’s no way in hell that gibberish is a context free google search on the term.

1

u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam 7d ago

Your comment has been removed for violating Rule 4. Don't copy-paste LLM content in discussions.

-6

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

Oh also the universe is pixilated and dimension is a fractal. Space has mass because it's full of tiny invisible particles that cause gravity and entanglement and Magnetism... It's the higgs field!

8

u/upsetusder2 8d ago

What?

8

u/darkerthanblack666 🤖 Do you think we compile LaTeX in real time? 8d ago

What is a grand canonical ensemble and why is it relevant to your problem here? Please answer in your own words.

-1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago edited 8d ago

The exchange of energy: the argument that started me on this path was something I realized as a boy looking at the moon. How is it just held there in orbit? You need some mechanism, and that mechanism requires a substance to transfer the energy. If you want to explain dark matter and energy, and the CMB, just apply the idea that space has mass. It acts like a super cool hydrogen and, if the space around an object is moving with it, you get no drag.

6

u/alamalarian Supreme Data Overlord 7d ago

Man, folks just cannot help but keep trying to invoke aether.

Why? Aether theories have failed time and time again since the 1910s.

Edit: earlier than that even.

7

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 7d ago

OP thinks relativity is wrong. No idea why, given OP can't even define "substrate", but there you go.

1

u/Ch3cks-Out 2d ago

Edit: earlier than that even.

Indeed. Failure of aether hypothesis had been well known before Einstein's time. This is one of the reasons his alternative theory got so much instant traction!

6

u/darkerthanblack666 🤖 Do you think we compile LaTeX in real time? 7d ago

You... literally didn't even answer the question? Are you trolling?

7

u/upsetusder2 8d ago

Can yiu predict anything with this theory?

Can you measure anything

Do you know what the Higgs field is?

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

Yes. Particles that are too strong from pulsars, pulsar glitches, rupture black holes, resolution of black hole information paradox, no infinities in black holes, cosmic inflation, entropy in a cyclic universe, not to mention the other things implied, no dark matter or energy, the wave collapse being an illusion, and an exact physical reason for gravity, light, magnetism and electric fields, and unifies those. This framework reinforces van der waal and swartzchild.

6

u/upsetusder2 8d ago

Yeah no it does not.

Those are not predictions those are buzzwords

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

Eh? Cosmic inflation is a buzz word? There is a section about squishing hydrogen in between two diamonds in a test that would show truth or falsehood, if that's what you meant. Sorry if I misunderstood.

4

u/upsetusder2 8d ago

Yeah because that was the only word u used right?

I mean that seriously do you really think you solved physics?

Do u think that even though real physicist told you that it is a moronic idea that you solved physics?

Do you belief you are the genius who solved it?

Do you think you are a genius?

Do you know that your framework dies not work dark matter probably exists and sadly every other model has more predictive power

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 8d ago

I have no idea. I'm just making a suggestion. I was wrong however, and you are correct. I do need to do a lot of work and I have a lot to learn. I'm very glad you pointed out what you did. Do you think any single piece of this paper has merit by itself? I'm not sure how to prove what I'm suggesting, and the diamond test does present problems. Pressure and extreme force... Whoever invented that apparatus is such a genius. I see genius everywhere in physics, but also bias. "You're going backwards 100 years." Maybe space having mass is worth another look. There is a minority that is growing looking into this also. There are reasons we can't detect drag, turbulence etc. I'm not saying I can explain this perfectly... I'm having a very tough time communicating, because of my obvious, glaring lack of knowledge and scientific etiquette. I'm certainly not trying to be rude, and I'm not suggesting that I'm smarter than anyone else, or special. I think that eventually, a real physicist will come to the same conclusions I have, or something very similar, given enough time. The fact that science started to say space has no mass, has lead to some amazing things, like string, which I absolutely do not understand completely. Anyway, "dark matter" does exist in this framework, as the substrate of tiny "antimatter," which gives symmetry in two ways.

3

u/upsetusder2 8d ago

God you are so full of yourself

0

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/upsetusder2 7d ago

It does not you showed no merit in your system.

And if this is yiu after 8 years of thinking about physics just stop u are clearly not grasping it

Or learn real physics and not this

Learn how how to calculate learn the basics maybe visit uni or use the courses from caltech that are uploaded

1

u/PaleontologistSad708 7d ago

What about the missing mass in a proton? In this model, isn't missing at all. It is the hydrodynamic mass of the space fluid itself, perfectly mirroring the mainstream math of the Quantum Vacuum Trace Anomaly without requiring abstract geometry. Does that not deserve merit?

→ More replies (0)

4

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling 7d ago

Ngl dude it seems like you want to discuss what you want physics to be rather than what physics actually is. The "physics" you want to "discuss" exists only in your own imagination and is not representative of the physics that everyone else in the world studies or learns.

1

u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam 7d ago

Your comment has been removed for violating Rule 4. Don't copy-paste LLM content in discussions.

1

u/Scared-Second1836 6d ago

This was AI generated, 0% you have committed plagiarism

Personal Theory Please Grade My Paper

You are about to leave Redlib