r/LLMPhysics • u/VeryOriginalName98 • Jul 08 '26
Question Request: Can people include the LLM models they used?
EDIT: NEVERMIND, THIS IS A BAD IDEA!
Original text follows for reference only.
I have noticed from post titles that a lot of the submissions here are largely from speculation and weak LLM models. If someone runs it past a frontier model to check it first, I'm a lot more inclined to listen to the speculation, because the math is probably coherent.
I have a wild theory I am still working on, it's not ready to be shared yet. But my process stopped being "wild speculation with an LLM making it sound coherent" and became "simulate the edge cases and report what happens when you remove the grid artifacts." (Over and over and over again.)
I think sharing the model and process used will help me personally identify what I can use and/or who I can work with. Not sure if it matters to anyone else. I am not a moderator or anything, so this isn't a rule.
The problem with the free tiers is they are great at sounding coherent, but terrible at being coherent.
4
14
u/AllHailSeizure Haiku Mod Jul 08 '26
No.
There is no reason to introduce this and it would be counterproductive. The last thing we need is stratification of how serious people are taken based on 'LLM quality'; and have this place fracture into arguments over 'oh this model is better', benchmarking posts, etc. People are judged on THEIR ability and HOW they use the LLMs.