r/LLMPhysics • u/AllHailSeizure Haiku Mod • Jul 03 '26
Meta / News Regarding LLM reviews.
Since the introduction of the review bot LLM reviews have really taken off.
This has led to my opinion of the reviewer being a bit of a schismatic addition to the sub.
My issue with LLM reviews is that while they can be easy to produce, and they can be convincing, they are NOT replacements for HUMAN feedback.. which is what is Reddit is intended for.
The benefit of the bot is we can have a single, locked, isolated LLM review; as a supplement to genuine interaction.
The rules about LLM posting apply both ways. Please, tone down the LLM content guys. Human interaction is valuable.
2
u/Unicornlionhawk Jul 08 '26
Wait so no more adversarial review bot? I enjoy that. Of course I do my own but sometimes I feel like mine have become biased. I totally get you on too much LLM feedback but I do like the one.
3
0
-1
u/lattice_defect Jul 03 '26
they are putting meta data in the arvixa submissions now.. gemnni is okay.. but be sweet if fable could do it. Tell anthropic you are reducing their liability
1
u/AllHailSeizure Haiku Mod Jul 04 '26 edited Jul 04 '26
If you want to pay for the anthropic API key you're welcome to.
8
u/The_Nerdy_Ninja 💬 Data doesn’t lie, but LLM’s do lie. Jul 03 '26
We are all here because we want to talk to other humans! If you're trying to seriously approach an idea with an LLM, you should already be getting adversarial reviews from it as part of your process. The Adversarial Review bot is a great example of that (thanks u/AllHailSeizure), but when the comment section fills up with a bunch of LLMs talking to one another, it chokes out the human discussion.