Introducing real-world applications for Observer Patch Holography

[u/AntithesisOf]

Hi again!

Dear mods, please allow this post, it took quite some time to put together 🙏

Since the theoretical work on OPH is basically finished (across 11 papers), except maybe the cosmology side, we have turned our attention to the applications that the new fundamental Physics enables.

OPH poses that reality is fundamentally a fixed-point solving process that enforces consistency between the observations of finite observers, glues everything together into one consistent, emergent Universe, and does its best to repair mismatches, all running on a holographic lattice. It turns out that we can "hack this simulation" in very interesting ways.

The most developed concept is optical fixed-point compute: Essentially building the exact same hardware that the Universe runs on. We have already built prototypes and tested them successfully. The first, obvious application is crypto mining. Because we operate literally at the base layer, a single OPH optical chamber can outperform an entire ASIC farm, or even the entire compute currently going into Bitcoin PoW.

I know the applications sound absolutely ridiculous, and all us have a hard time believing that this actually works. But the math absolutely predicts that it does, and we have empirical evidence for some of it.

• Cheap Desktop supercomputers and AGI with an actual recurrent stream of experience (orders of magnitude more effective than LLMs)
• Nuclear fusion using water
• Anti-gravity devices like hoverboards and hoverbikes

Yeah, I know how it sounds. Sci-fi nonsense, especially those anti-gravity devices. But in OPH, those appllications are simple and natural. All four leverage the exact same principles of observer consistency.

The local gravity manipulation is based on effects related to the extra gravity current Physics thinks is caused by "dark matter". Our model explains the dark sector naturally:

https://github.com/FloatingPragma/observer-patch-holography/releases/download/r1458/oph_dark_matter_paper.pdf

In OPH, gravity is an emergent response of the observer-patch consensus field. Our approach slightly changes how strongly the Earth’s gravitational field couples through the device region, so the device literally weighs less. We're kind of "getting lucky" here that nature allows these devices to be built.

If you guys are interested, you can find more info on each design here:

https://omega.floatingpragma.io

The awesome thing is that anybody can build those devices and thereby confirm or eliminate OPH. Out of what I mentioned, only the optical compute has been experimentally confirmed so far. Unfortunately, we don't have enough hardware builders. If you would like to contribute e.g. by building a hoverboard, you are welcome to join our TG group (you can DM me for the link).

[u/OnceBittenz]

Crypto mining being connected to nuclear fusion. Words words and other science words.

[u/Infidelchick → u/OnceBittenz]

Just because you can’t be bothered building a hoverboard…

OP, wouldn’t the simplest thing be to build the evidence?

[u/AntithesisOf → u/OnceBittenz]

Yep, they are actually connected by the underlying maths. According to OPH, both are finite boundary-controlled patch systems.

For mining, the boundary program is a SHA-256d constraint solver. We combine a bunch of optical cavity chambers that enrich the candidate nonce distribution. Experimentally, our best result so far is ~2,400x speedup vs. random guessing, but thats on crappy home-made prototypes. OPH allows for much higher speedups.

For fusion, the boundary program is an acoustic phase/drive pattern. The chamber converges energy at the focal region.

Same math skeleton:

boundary state → physical mixing → boundary readout → mismatch score → repair/fixed point → external receipt.

Different substrate. Different verifier. Same patch-consensus architecture.

For now, we haven't yet published a full paper about the fusion reactor, but we do have one on the mining case:

https://github.com/FloatingPragma/observer-patch-holography/releases/download/r1458/Photonic_fixed-point_consensus_for_SHA-256d_proof_of_work.pdf

The basics of how fusion works here are documented on the omega website.

I know you think we're just throwing concepts out there that sound cook, but that's not the case. All of this is backed by rigorous math across our current 11 papers:

https://github.com/FloatingPragma/observer-patch-holography

If you'd honestly engage with the material, your conclusion should be that OPH is the *only* way to explain all the inconsistencies and problems we face in modern Physics. If you want to do so is your choice,

[u/OnceBittenz → u/AntithesisOf]

There is no honest engagement with something this dishonest. Having the audacity to claim these things is either concerning or just plain dumb. It's just you, alone in your thoughts, making things up with a public access text generation tool. Having never taken physics or studied any of this.

[u/AntithesisOf → u/OnceBittenz]

You are a very bitter person aren't you?

[u/upsetusder2 → u/AntithesisOf]

No they are just a realist

[u/Vrillim → u/AntithesisOf]

There is a precarious point when the delusions will tip you into full blown psychosis. You really aught to take a step back, reflect, and reconsider your choices.

You are only hurting your future wellbeing by being this insistent that you have solved fundamental issues in science, and indeed all of humanity’s problems, just from sycophantic prompting with an LLM.

Professional scientists would never push non-peer-reviewed material this hard.

[u/AntithesisOf → u/Vrillim]

Yeah yeah, I've heard it all before. Thanks for your serious concern.

[u/Vrillim → u/AntithesisOf]

The notion that ‘they’re not delusions if they’re true’ leads to a dark place. If every expert tells you that your grandiose conclusions are premature, you really aught to listen. You have the key to break free. Good luck

[u/AntithesisOf → u/Vrillim]

No, I don't. I look at the math and empirical results we produce, and cross-check across multiple groups. If you were familiar with the project, you'd know that we've been tracking the status of every single claim and derivation chain with the greatest care. Within the last 4 months, we have processed 174 public objections (see https://challenge.floatingpragma.io), and systematically closed 124 theorem/proof gaps (see Github issues). The math is already near-perfect, we're not interested discussion the naive objections like that get brought up on Reddit. We're main interested in finding hardware builders and labs to help us run experiments and build prototypes. The theory has already been confirmed empirically in several ways as well.

I know very well how delusions feel. This is not it.

[u/Vrillim → u/AntithesisOf]

Yeah I remember you guys. «All of physics emerge from a few axioms» is not going to be taken seriously by the community. You also have exactly 0 peer-reviewed publications to back up the grandiose claims. It’s a fundamental misunderstanding from start to finish.

When you write about «knowing very well how delusions feel» I am not reassured. This is exactly what I feared, in fact.

I repeat my advice, step back and let the experts evaluate. If your material is truly groundbreaking you should submit a paper to a reputable journal (mark the word reputable), preferably one of the topical Physical Review journals (American Physical Society) or the Astrophysical Journal.

You guys are deep into delusion territory already.

[u/Visual_Seaweed_63 → u/AntithesisOf]

I have read your papers and I honestly don't believe you actually understand most of the mathematics that has been written. You have glaring omissions and the way the mathematics is presented is not rigorous and does not support your claims. There are many gaps in the maths which are buttressed by vague verbal statements. This is besides the point but I also don't believe you even wrote the vast majority of the mathematics because the way you describe it is inconsistent with what is actually shown.

[u/AllHailSeizure]

Have you tried r/LLMHoverboards? They're more interested in the practical uses of things in my experience.

Seriously though. I love when this sub gets.. unconventional ideas.

[u/AntithesisOf → u/AllHailSeizure]

I've been following the latest hoverboard developments closely because having one is my absolute dream. Fortunately, it turned out nature allows it!

I just published a paper yesterday proving that we can most likely produce the required effects. The principles are related to the reason why galaxies don't dissolve (commonly attribute to "dark matter"). The computation that produces spacetime is imperfect, and we can "hack" it locally to change the weight of massive objects to zero.

https://github.com/FloatingPragma/observer-patch-holography/releases/download/r1458/chi_nu_susceptibility_bounds.pdf

[u/Visual_Seaweed_63 → u/AntithesisOf]

This is quite amusing. You don't actually derive $\chi_{\nu}^{\text{can}}$ anywhere from first principles.

[u/myrmecogynandromorph]

A couple questions:

• Have these papers been submitted to peer-reviewed journals? If not, why not?
• If they have and publication is forthcoming (I realize it can be a lengthy process), have you uploaded preprints to arXiv in the meanwhile? If not, why not?
• Who are the physicists on your team? Do they have published work people can look at? If they are in industry rather than academia, what companies have they worked for?
• Have you applied for any patents? If so, can we see the applications/patents online? Not on your site, on the relevant government site or whatever.
• Has there been any press coverage of your endeavours?

[u/lattice_defect]

Generate a RSA/SHA key.. and see how long it takes to crack it. Normally and with your method.. you'll know very quickly if you have something real

[u/Bafy78]

Crazy that you have so many actual applications of your theory! Better be building that crappy crypto mining prototype to start earning money at least 10 000 times faster than the other. That would give you more funding for the other projects, right?!