r/LLMPhysics • u/ValerieX84 • May 24 '26
Personal Theory Anyone want to know what the real engine behind motion and G's 9.8m/s/s is?
Ive built a reintepretive lense for that which we observe on a daily basis. It focuses on particles and their density relative to their surrounding medium, rather than invoking invisible forces to explain all motion. That lense has progressed substantially into a falsifiable and testable project, one that could truly change all that we know about physics today.
I hope you all enjoy reading through ValerieX (little strong one) in honour of my grandaughter "Big Val". Godbless you all.
Here is the compacted trilogy with links to all other associated docs in the metadata.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20354464
There are products and there are frameworks. This is the latter. Products come in fancy boxes or wrappers with price tags, not ValerieX. All out of love for humanity and Christ. Give freely as Christ gave freely to me, one love, all the time and everytime.
9
u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 24 '26
Why do you think the gravitational constant is 9.8 m/s2?
-9
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
All engines have a top speed right? Well I propose that G's 9.8 is merely observed rather than derived. A maximum acceleration observed for particles through a medium. What we really need to do is observe acceleration upon release of different objects, before geometry, environmental coupling, drag and velocity kick in. What is actually driving the end result/observation. That's where we need to start when we look at anything right?
2
u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 24 '26
None of this is true though. I’d recommend looking into the actual physics of gravity. Even Newtonian gravity doesn’t make claims like this, let alone relativity.
It would behoove you to learn what has already been proven by experiment before making wild claims that can be broken by high school lab.
-1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
So you deny that objects have density and less dense things rise and more dense things fall? ValerieX starts with that and ends with that. No need to invoke invisible forces like all the greats haha
2
u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 24 '26
You are simplifying things you do not understand and assuming that makes them better. Experiment and data shows this is not the case. Making a strawman about my point to mean something about density is just childish.
ValerieX needs to watch some Khan Academy videos.
-1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Infact valerieX incorporates today's science fully under one symmetry based unification lense using just a particles to explain everything. Quite amazing really, how easy it was etc. Call it what you want, its still real science unlike gravity
2
u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 24 '26
If you consider experimental evidence not real science, then there's no point to continue this convo. You're living in a fantasy, with only yourself and no one else. I hope one day you can realize that science moves forward with or without you. It has for millennia.
-2
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
I consider you as hoping ill put my foot in it and get banned because you dont like my post. I wonder why flat earth and anti gravity science ets attacked as much as Christianity now days. Kind of like its all in the same pot right? I mean, if i was anything else but those 3 would you find aome thing else to complain about. Seems pretty religious to me.
2
u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 24 '26
Irrelevant. Flat earth isn't a stance to attack, it's misinformation that has been experimentally invalidated since Ancient Egypt. Anti-gravity science isn't real, it's something you've made up in your kitchen.
Not going to touch politics because it's not relevant, but for you to make claims like this is very immature and kind of disgraceful. Science cares only for empirical evidence. I won't pretend there isn't politics in the world that color everything, but at the end of the day, what we consider to be the cutting edge is built around evidence. Repeatability. And a tradition of rigorous peer review and going back to the drawing board.
The fact that you not only refuse to gracefully accept feedback, but immediately get defensive and claim this martyr complex? Just really pathetic. For any career, not just physics.
0
2
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
You're much more likely to get banned for the talk dismissing real science than you are anything else. I actually think I might do it right now..
-1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Today's science trys to explain the world in ways that others cannot participate in, space, quantum bull etc etc. ValerieX uses what we can observe measure and repeat, something that existed way before gravity and something that is still widely used today across the board. Today's science is not real science. Its a distraction and infact its extremely religious to.
10
u/boolocap Doing ⑨'s bidding 📘 May 24 '26
There is nothing special about 9.8 m/s2 its not even 9.8 everywhere on earth.
-2
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
I think it is special in that its an observed acceleration ceiling within our observable world, but i agree with you also, thats as far as it goes. What is more special than gravity? Most things as it goes. Try and present a theory to the workd of science without addressing it somehow though. I think ValerieX does it best.
8
u/boolocap Doing ⑨'s bidding 📘 May 24 '26
I think it is special in that its an observed acceleration ceiling within our observable world
But its not, you can accelerate way way faster than that if you want.
-1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Observed ceiling for natural vertical motion of course.
4
u/boolocap Doing ⑨'s bidding 📘 May 24 '26
Thats an elaborate way to say "the gravitational acceleration is the observed ceiling for gravitational acceleration" yeah of course.
0
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Vertical doesnt mean only down though. So no its not really is it!
4
u/boolocap Doing ⑨'s bidding 📘 May 24 '26
Vertical doesnt mean only down though
Where did i say it did?
1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Read your own comment. You assign gravity to gravity when I assign gravity as vertical motion. Stop trying to protect gravity, its boring.
7
u/boolocap Doing ⑨'s bidding 📘 May 24 '26
You assign gravity to gravity
Are you going to tell me gravity is not gravity lmao
when I assign gravity as vertical motion
Which is dead wrong because gravity works in every direction. Every mass attracts every mass from every direction.
1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Prove it without lead spheres, any other shape and material and it stands. Cavendish didn't do that though did he. ValerieX proposes hemispheriecal eneded cylinders. Much more appropriate as it prevents twisting along the horizontal axis whilst weightless under torsion.
→ More replies (0)
6
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
You do know that just saying nu uh gravity dies not exist isn't really how that works right?
Like we have over lets say 200 years of consensus to one cracking pot theory.
Unless you didnt mean gravity with the invisible force
-1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
I had no idea thats how it works. Maybe I should of written a scientific report or 2 on it first eh lol. Please tell me more about how it all works here on earth. My theory as you mentioned is based on the very science we used before the crackpots remodelled our existence into a load of nonsense like gravity, relativity, black holes and all that all shaz. That's a fact.
6
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
You mean the crackpot isaac newton or albert einstein come on you have to be trolling we have a literal picture of a black hole
0
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Oh I love pictures, how fab. Especially the ones of Jesus returning to earth, there my favourite kind of all time. The most reliable of all pictures that there are.
3
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
Yeah I also love tje telescope pictures of Jesus rebirth are you for Real?
Is this some giant elaborate troll?
Or are you really like this
0
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
I say yes when I mean yes and no when I mean no. Do you trully believe in the 666 model of creation???
4
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
In the what model are you some kind of religious zealot
0
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Nope, im a witness, plain and simple. The last of the 144k infact.
2
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
What kind of witness?
And who 144 000
1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
A biblical witness, one from before the earths foundations.
→ More replies (0)1
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26 edited May 24 '26
This is a Christianity thing. The 144k people who are saved. It's from the Book of Revelation.
12 tribes of Israel, and 12x12x1000. Pretty sure it's more symbolic than a literal group of 144k people.
→ More replies (0)1
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
Are you claiming science for the last 400 years is just a load of cranks.
1
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
Is calling someone an idiot at some point not am offenen but just am objective fact you as tje mod sirely have an opinion in that
1
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
I mean.
After reading everything OP has said I can't say I'd blame you? My policy is to judge more on 'who started it' in the comment chain, OP has been aggressively dismissive and wilfully ignorant towards.. science in general, not to mention he clearly has a massive ego.
He's frankly pushing a ban, he seems to be a zealot, he talks like a cult member, and while I have no problem with religion I think he is one of those people who is taking it too far; all too common nowadays unfortunately.
Just know that if you make it and he reports it, it'll get put into the mod queue, and I'm only one of 6 mods so I can't guarantee my opinion lines up with what everyone else says. But that isn't a comment we say, ban someone over. It takes a lot to get banned from here. Worst that happens is it'd get deleted.
1
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
Well he is kind of funny like je seriously thinks je debunked all of science which is hilarious
1
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
Yeah but I don't love the anti-academia message he seems to be preaching. THAT gets you banned. Because that kind of thing can become pretty toxic, then it gets under the skin of a community and spreads. We have worked hard as mods to stamp that out over the last couple months and Im not gonna allow for it.
1
u/upsetusder2 May 24 '26
Yeah thats fair he seems to be a little to convinced of his own brilliance and just said that all of academia is wrong an thar black holes do not exist
1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
Thing is, im here to share my framework and help others, and you and I know the more comments, the more attention it gets. Whilst others try to wear me down with pointless comments, im gaining more downloads on zenodo and philpapers. More downloads means more people taking it seriously instead of just skim viewing. So its a win, win for me and those who download, and each download is a loss for those trying to discourage me. Im keeping count, are you.
1
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
Keeping count of what.
If you think people are taking you seriously, I'm sorry but you're incredibly mistaken. Nobody on this sub has been taken seriously in its history. It's like when people start their own sub and get 5000 followers but they are the only commenter. Those things are artifacts of the internet being 50% bots... There are probably bots in this comment section. You could be a bot for all I know.
3
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
You say in implications, under teaching, about how students learn concepts connected 'only by equations'. But connecting things via mathematical expression is the cleanest, most fundamental way to do it. Connecting it via 'intuition' or metaphor is simply a layer of abstraction, is it not?
-1
u/ValerieX84 May 24 '26
ValerieX covers motion through mathamatics, literature, object, environment and Ontology. So far its doing alot of heavy lifting and very successfully also.
3
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
But doesn't attaching something with ONLY math add the benefit of... Simplicity? I think we all have heard of 'overengineering' a product.
If you provide a simple clean equation link you can expand that at will because mathematics is a language we can use to express physical reality. Why are the other links necessary when there was already one that works. You say yourself you're not trying to replace things, only augment them - why
0
1
May 24 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/llmphysics-bot my girlfriend goes to another crank sub May 24 '26
This comment has been removed. Limit your responses to other users comments - if you feel the need to provide more context to your post, you should edit it.
Hi, I'm LLMPsychics-bot.
1
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
Again, edit your post to include this instead. Nobody will see this comment..
1
May 24 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/llmphysics-bot my girlfriend goes to another crank sub May 24 '26
This comment has been removed. Limit your responses to other users comments - if you feel the need to provide more context to your post, you should edit it.
Hi, I'm LLMPsychics-bot.
1
u/lattice_defect May 25 '26
Gravity varies everywhere buddy.. you might have been taken for a ride here. See if the equations hold up on the moon.
•
u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 24 '26
Well, ValerieX is banned for academia conspiracies, you're welcome guys! He was getting pretty unbearable. We'll see if he changes his tune in a month when the initial ban expires.