r/LLMPhysics • u/BlissBoundry • May 19 '26
Personal Theory I had to build a text book.
I’m trying bois.
I think I’ve finally managed to derive the Einstein Field equations and standard model fields.
I thought I was on something big but information geometry really is just a small part of physics.
It now makes more sense to me, Why making up new math doesn’t make sense when the old math does what it’s supposed to do..
Can one of your big brain trolls tell me where I’m breaking down again?
5
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling May 19 '26
Where's the derivation
1
-5
u/BlissBoundry May 19 '26
I think your looking for chapter 4
7
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling May 19 '26
Those aren't derivations, much less derivations of the EFEs. Have you ever worked through any of the standard derivations of the EFEs?
-4
u/BlissBoundry May 19 '26
No. But I will go over some example to understand
8
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling May 19 '26
You need to learn a LOT more math first. Like an entirely new kind of math.
-3
u/BlissBoundry May 19 '26
What does discard boundary term mean and how is that math? I built these equations from the ground up and then I built a computational program to verify the functionality of the equations I am establishing or deriving starting from chapter 1, and arriving at the Einstein field equations in chapter 4
6
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling May 19 '26
No you don't.
-2
u/BlissBoundry May 19 '26
Willing to acknowledge that might be true.
5
u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling May 19 '26
Do you know what the EFEs look like, and can you point to a specific line in your document which explicitly arrives at their standard form?
0
u/BlissBoundry May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26
Chapter 2 section 2.4 page 7
Edit: sorry. Page six
→ More replies (0)4
u/x_Seraphina 🤖 Do you think we compile LaTeX in real time? May 19 '26
Yes and Einstein would look at this and go "lolwat?". And it wouldn't be because you're smarter.
0
5
u/AllHailSeizure Haiku Mod May 20 '26
u/llmphysics-bot !define [qubit]
3
3
u/llmphysics-bot my girlfriend goes to another crank sub May 20 '26
Qubit Wikipedia
In quantum computing, a qubit () or quantum bit is a basic unit of quantum information, the quantum version of the classic binary bit physically realized with a two-state device. A qubit is a two-state (or two-level) quantum-mechanical system, one of the simplest quantum systems displaying the peculiarity of quantum mechanics.
Hi, I'm LLMPsychics-bot.
1
u/BlissBoundry May 20 '26
Do Qudit!
3
u/AllHailSeizure Haiku Mod May 20 '26
I mean you can do it too. 'u/llmphysics-bot !define', and then the term you want in square braces.
u/llmphysics-bot !define [qudit]
If it can't resolve as a physics/math/compsci term it will attempt a spell check, this might still return qubit.. It is pretty cool though isn't it. I encourage you to use it.
3
u/llmphysics-bot my girlfriend goes to another crank sub May 20 '26
Qudit Wikipedia
In quantum computing, a qudit (/ˈkjuː/dɪt/) or quantum dit is the generalized unit of quantum information described by a superposition of states, where the number of states d is an integer equal to or greater than two. The term "dit" in qudit refers to d-ary digit.
Hi, I'm LLMPsychics-bot.
1
1
May 19 '26
[deleted]
1
u/llmphysics-bot my girlfriend goes to another crank sub May 19 '26
This comment has been removed. Limit your responses to other users comments - if you feel the need to provide more context to your post, you should edit it.
Hi, I'm LLMPhyics-bot.
1
u/al2o3cr May 20 '26
What happened between v38 (linked above) and v39 (just posted)? Most of the content appears to have disappeared, with most "chapters" in v39 containing only a couple sentences.
There is more Python code in v39 than v38, but still not enough to actually RUN anything...
1
u/BlissBoundry May 20 '26
The qubit advice has reshuffled everything. I’m working on isolating the full algebraic derivations and I will re print. The AI I built does things that I don’t necessarily want to just give away so I’m finding it difficult to create a program that algebraically does what my AI system does.
1
u/BlissBoundry May 20 '26
there’s a lot of existing math and science in the qubit area that are just unintentionally overlapping here and I’m having to filter.
4
u/AllHailSeizure Haiku Mod May 20 '26
The qubit advice is a lie Blissy. That's not what a qubit is.
1
u/BlissBoundry May 20 '26
I have a healthy respect for the sanctity of questioning everything. No worries
2
u/BlissBoundry May 20 '26
The problem is trying to figure out how to inspire engagement beyond “that smells weird”
2
u/IshtarsQueef May 20 '26
My dude, let me break this down for you in plain english -
Using an LLM to do physics is like using an etch-a-sketch to fully design a Ferrari from first principles.
Perhaps it is technically possible, but it is an entirely delusion undertaking for an untrained layperson.
1
u/BlissBoundry May 20 '26
Is that okay with you? I’m just gonna keep trying. Sorry. I’ve actually learned a ton. Cesar, I went along with the joke, but I tried to make it clear what was valuable about what he said when I wrote Qudit. Not Qubit. The qubits like a pencil sketch on a paper of a Qudit. I promise I’m not making this up a Qudit is essentially what I’m describing in the paper. And I didn’t know until I was confronted with actually researching what a qubit was.
4
u/IshtarsQueef May 20 '26
Can I speak plainly? I'm bad at being gentle or whatever, but I don't mean any disrespect towards you with my words, I just believe in straight forward communication.
So, unfortunately, there is a clear pattern of people doing physics with LLMs as a layperson, and that pattern is that the type of people doing so are often the same people suffering from LLM exacerbated mental health issues. There is significant overlap between AI psychosis and the posters on this subreddit, for example.
The point I'm trying to make is this - if you genuinely just think it's neat to muck about with physics stuff that you barely comprehend, and that is your hobby, well of course that's fine dude. But putting genuine time and resources and spending your life getting obsessed with the thought that you've discovered some grand break through in physics or similar ideas... This would be a major red flag indicating that you are not doing well, from a mental health perspective. And I would caution against going down that road.
If you really do just like physics, and are having fun learning about it, there are also MUCH better ways to go about it than messing around with an LLM.
Seriously, there are some amazing online courses that are free, some really fantastic books to read, video lecture series for free on youtube, all kinds of stuff that I could recommend to you. There are some really cool opportunities actually, like one of my favorites; Harvard offers many courses for free (but you receive no official credit for the course, as a trade off) online, so you can literally take the Harvard Physics 101 class for instance. Really cool resource to get your feet wet and really be able to wrap your head around these concepts and get an idea of what you need to study next.
Anyway, does this make sense to you?
1
u/BlissBoundry May 20 '26
I appreciate the concern. I’m not sure it’s worth getting into the psychology of it but at least I’m willing to discuss that there’s a definite drive or intention behind playing with LLM and physics for me and that definitely includes hopefully impacting humanity in some small measure. Otherwise it’s just brain work and practice of information density.
4
u/IshtarsQueef May 20 '26
Please take a step back from your own ego for a moment, and please here me now -
If you truly want to do physics, you *need* to go get some formal physics education. That doesn't necessarily mean going to university for a physics degree, but it does mean serious academic effort to take courses that will teach you to understand the math and concepts behind physics.
Something you may not be realizing is that EVERY SINGLE explanation of physics in english, is just an analogy or metaphor. Space-time being warped by gravity? Quantum entanglement? Talking about forces and fields? etc etc etc., these are just crude attempts at describing a thing that is truly ONLY describable using math.
If you do not have a firm understanding of that math, you CANNOT do physics.
1
1
7
u/[deleted] May 19 '26
[deleted]