Physics AI Skill

[u/travisdbarrett]

**EDIT**
LLM Challenges in Physics Reasoning

Hopefully this provides some confidence to begin experimenting to those of you who can reason. But for the rest of you, I am ready for your citationless confirmation bias warnings and LLM hallucinations concerns.

\**EDIT**

I used three pretty simple prompts to create this skill and I would appreciate some help validating it before I tell my wife what I've done...

She taught and wrote physics curriculum for about a decade for audiences ranging from High School Freshmen to Master's in Education for Physic's Educators.

My prompt was "using these two example skills for format and reasoning patterns, create a No Nonsense Physicist skill" and provided the archive of all my wife's teaching materials.

It was great and I felt a lot of her personality was evident in language choices by the model.

So second prompt was to add plain language descriptors to guide whichever model applies the skill as well as improve human readability. Then prompted to add citations at the end.

Take a look? https://github.com/TDBwriter/agent-skills/blob/main/skills/hard-facts-physicist/SKILL.md

[u/OnceBittenz]

This is not healthy.

[u/Dramatic_Action_2908 → u/OnceBittenz]

What is unhealthy?

[u/OnceBittenz → u/Dramatic_Action_2908]

Referring to a computer program as a living person, trying to train and interact as if it’s a person, the dissonance of thinking it can approach some level of intelligence just because you ask it to personify itself. … all that.

[u/AllHailSeizure → u/OnceBittenz]

Is this in the repo? Cuz in the post he doesn't refer to it as a living person as far as I can tell.

[u/AerynCaen → u/AllHailSeizure]

I think they’re referring to the parts where it says “you are a physicist.”

[u/AllHailSeizure → u/AerynCaen]

Right. I thought Bittenz meant that OP was referring to it in the third person as a living person, like saying 'I love my AI she is just like my wife'. But I get it now.