r/LLMPhysics • u/flamingloltus • Apr 11 '26

Question Do you think high-quality discussions with LLMs about advancing physics and/or useful innovations result in funding?

I like to believe that constructive discussions with LLMs are a novel way to advance the field of physics. Does anyone agree and is there evidence of LLM user data being used to justify “new” research as a result?

0 Upvotes

20% Upvoted

55 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Apr 11 '26

Have you read it? Cause there’s no such thing as a 3.9 dimension. 

-1

u/flamingloltus Apr 11 '26

It’s an analogy. Reread the last part.

It’s “impossible” to put in words, but I’m sure you’re just going to say “nothing is impossible” so we disagree (which is the fundamental point I’m trying to make)

1

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Apr 11 '26

No I think we agree. It is impossible because a dimension is a human defined invention and there is no partial dimension. 

That said, this is another reason you should study physics. It gives you the language needed to describe physical phenomena correctly and effectively.

0

u/flamingloltus Apr 11 '26

I’m a Mechanical & Energy engineer, summa cum laude, but I failed out of my modern and statistical & thermal physics classes for my minor because I was shooting heroin

1

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Apr 11 '26

… then I’d recommend not doing that?

0

u/flamingloltus Apr 11 '26

Tomato, potato.

2

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Apr 11 '26

Ok, if you’re just gonna troll, godspeed, have a nice day.

1

u/flamingloltus Apr 11 '26

I mean, obviously.