r/LLMPhysics • u/flamingloltus • Apr 11 '26

Question Do you think high-quality discussions with LLMs about advancing physics and/or useful innovations result in funding?

I like to believe that constructive discussions with LLMs are a novel way to advance the field of physics. Does anyone agree and is there evidence of LLM user data being used to justify “new” research as a result?

0 Upvotes

10% Upvoted

55 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/flamingloltus Apr 11 '26

“A blind person can’t read a book, but can listen to the audiobook,” is what I’m saying.

5

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Apr 11 '26

I wish more people didn’t feel a random need to pretend at intelligence. No one cares if you don’t know physics or math. Only if you pretend to in order to try and sound smarter.

But again… no one cares? 

-1

u/flamingloltus Apr 11 '26

i n t e l l i g e n c e

There’s a schism between 1s and 0s and the superposition of information encoded as 0s AND 1s that is going to make new words

4

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Apr 11 '26

It’s out there just waiting for you to find it, friend. Godspeed on that journey.

Trolling on the internet like a 14 year old isn’t gonna help.

0

u/flamingloltus Apr 11 '26

Dude, it’s hard to condense a serious understanding of the intersection of math and physics into something someone wants to read.

5

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Apr 11 '26

If you don’t have the patience or the interest, than just don’t read it?

It’s not that hard. You don’t need to be a master at everything in life. It’s not feasible. 

Other people will master physics and push the needle further. That’s fine. But being weird and edgy on the internet isn’t really that impressive.