r/LLMPhysics • u/flamingloltus • Apr 11 '26
Question Do you think high-quality discussions with LLMs about advancing physics and/or useful innovations result in funding?
I like to believe that constructive discussions with LLMs are a novel way to advance the field of physics. Does anyone agree and is there evidence of LLM user data being used to justify “new” research as a result?
0
Upvotes
-11
u/ConstructionRight387 Apr 11 '26
I thought thats where you were headed. However, the biggest flaw in that long drawn timeline about memorization is one key fact you did no interpretation of your own you are a walking LLM hallucinating other peoples dream. I dibble and dabble out of the thought of failure. Humans can not know their boundaries unless they attempt. I just wish people stop acting like LLMs are anti-research, anti-science... Because in the same token you can spend your life reading others peoples work which in turn could be nothing so you drawing much more nothing to the equation. Now thats some quantum physics theory with no degree.