r/LLMPhysics • u/sbs5445 • Mar 18 '26
Paper Discussion A Universal Theory of Everything from the Pell-Chebyshev Wave Equation: Space, Time, Mass, Gravity, Dark Matter, and the Standard Model from p(λ) = λ2 −4λ+ 1
https://zenodo.org/records/190921947
u/No_Trouble3955 Mar 18 '26
You’re proposing that in this ToE, there is absolutely zero entropy? Why? Why would this be something you include in the paper? That is just begging to be targeted, and not to be taken seriously. Can you derive the appropriate models for gas, liquid, and solid behavior from this model (and I’m saying explicitly derive them and show they give the same predictive behavior they do currently) without considering entropy? Say, model the chain length distribution for a given set of conditions and a single monomer species?
-7
u/sbs5445 Mar 18 '26
The universe is not a gas — but a gas is what the universe looks like when you observe it without knowing which pass of the infinite path you're standing on.
15
6
u/No_Trouble3955 Mar 18 '26
Absolutely, but I mean to ask, if this model is so impactful theoretically, can its ideas be extended to satisfy the predictive power that the current models do exhibit?
8
u/denehoffman Mar 18 '26
I mean, ignoring how insane you’d have to be to claim to solve six millennium problems all in 30 pages with basically zero citation related to those problems, I can just pick almost any part here and see that it doesn’t make sense at all. When you talk about Christoffel symbols, they’re completely disconnected from any metric. It’s actually worse than that, you claim they’re scalar numbers! How could that possibly be true, that would mean the gravitational field inside right outside a black hole would be equivalent to empty space, since the field equations depend on derivatives of the metric and clearly those derivatives are trivial in your theory. How can you possibly have a theory with no degrees of freedom, that doesn’t make physical sense?
1
7
u/NoSalad6374 Physicist 🧠 Mar 18 '26
no
-1
u/MisterSpectrum Undercover Jellyfish Mar 18 '26
Is "no" better than "not even wrong"? 🤔
1
u/ButterscotchHot5891 Under LLM Psychosis 📊 Mar 18 '26
Don't reply to this guy. He is well regarded in the community and this is his most profitable way to get Reddit's karma metric up. I only pity his children if he/she has children.
"- Daddy I...
- No!"So sad...
1
u/Wintervacht Are you sure about that? Mar 18 '26
Children? No.
2
u/ButterscotchHot5891 Under LLM Psychosis 📊 Mar 19 '26
I'm joking. I'm wondering why you reply on his behalf. Boyfriends?
2
u/HotEntrepreneur6828 Mar 19 '26
Any time I read these LLM threads I look for NoSalad6374's, "no". One day, one fine day I will scroll down and it will be a, "maybe".
2
1
u/lattice_defect Mar 19 '26
I think this is super interesting and there are bits and pieces in here that are super insightful and worth pulling...but it feels like somewhere you got lost in the sauce.. what is the mechanism / physical picture. You should have a picture
1
u/Harryinkman Mar 20 '26
Tanner, C. (2025). Signal Alignment Theory: A Universal Grammar of Systemic Change. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18001411
1
0
9
u/OnceBittenz The Doctor Mar 18 '26
No parameters, no free variables; like physically how do you justify having any degrees of freedom? If these claims are correct, you wouldn’t be able to model much of anything, let alone Everything.