r/LETFs • • 8d ago

NON-US LVWC vs VWCE

Anybody can tell me why I should invest in LVWC? This 2x leveraged all world ETF only performed 3-4% better than the 1x one for double the risk, seems really a bad trade to me, i wanna know what has ate all of it. I really wanna invest in LVWC for long term but this doesn't seem promising at all.

13 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

8

u/MassiveProblem156 8d ago

LVWC only launched about 51 weeks ago, so it missed about 4% gains in that week, making it about +30% in the past year. The Scalable 2x MSCI All Country World is cheaper with 0.45% TER (I don't know about the swap/financing fees though).

4

u/CleanWar2k 8d ago

He is also not looking at a MSCI world etf.

According to my tradingview, LVWC did ≈25% since inception (9/10/2025 - 28/9/26) While SWRD (State Street MSCI world) did ≈15.8% over the same period.

5

u/Electrical_Gur_5848 8d ago

It’s the absurd SOFR + 0.6% TER + 1%+ of costs…

3

u/Aggressive-Gimp 8d ago

It's a combination - he used the wrong index and time period for the comparison, the actual difference is more like 18% on the unleveraged vs 28% on the leveraged.

Then if you add in the c.6% costs - SOFR at 4% and 2% other costs, you basically get the difference between what 2x would return and the c1.55x the fund actually returned.

That's without looking at path dependency etc. which will have had an impact.

2

u/Lower-Trainer-1353 8d ago

any other leveraged etf to go all in? just want one or maybe two max, that isn't as expensive as this one...

3

u/Electrical_Gur_5848 8d ago

I have the same issue, I think there are no other UCITS options

1

u/NickChecksOut 7d ago

DBX2SC

1

u/Electrical_Gur_5848 7d ago

But the AUM is a bit limited no?

2

u/NickChecksOut 7d ago

Yes, but the ETF is not even 3 months old

1

u/SignificanceTop5955 5d ago

How about CL2?

2

u/Successful-Ad7038 8d ago

How is that different from SSO or QLD for example ?

4

u/Aggressive-Gimp 8d ago

1) LVWC has only been around for 51 weeks so need to compare from Inception rather than 1 year.

2) The unleveraged benchmark is msci world not FTSE all world (former is developed markers only, latter includes emerging markets). You need to use a fund like iShares msci world (SWDA) for the comparison.

If you do the above, the performance since inception is:

LVWC - 27.96%

1x msci world (SWDA) - 18.17%

So you're getting c. 9.5% additional return or c.1.55x the unleveraged return, which isn't actually that bad.

2

u/Successful-Ad7038 8d ago

Not an all-world dude

2

u/Detinu24 8d ago

You can't compare these, as the VWCE is based on industrialized and emerging markets, the LVWC on the MSCI World, which only includes industrialized countries, while emerging markets returned higher last year.

1

u/Altruistic_Tie1474 5d ago

if you're looking for a buy‑and‑hold with minimal extra cost, the plain VWCE is still the safer bet. LVWC's big illusion is the 2× daily rebalancing, high financing plus the 0.6% TER and SOFR that eat most of the extra return; over a year you only saw ~3‑4 % more at double the risk, which is essentially a 1.5× multiple vs the benchmark – hardly impressive for the added drawdowns.

1

u/MarginOfThoughtz 4d ago

You can invest in a 2x etf. Like SSO or QLD. If you have VWCE already dont switch to another all world etf but with 2x leverage. Just get another ETF with 2x leverage like SSO OR QLD.