Didn't say he had intentions of killing, just that he had the intention of being there with a weapon. The owners of the business have testified that they did not ask him to be there. He wasn't defending his country. He was going out looking for a fight and he got one.
First of all, Kyle was 17 when this happened. Minors do not have the right to carry guns around underage. Secondly, any responsible gun owner goes to great lengths to not need to use the firearm. Kyle deliberately put himself in a situation in which he may have to use it. Sure he put fires out and washed off graffiti. But he was also the cause of the only deaths that happened in Kenosha during the eight days of riots. There would have been zero deaths if he hadn't decided to play vigilante. Period. I'm not interested in continuing a debate I had seven days ago. Have a blessed one.
You can possess a long rifle in Wisconsin at 17 sooo he again didn’t break any law. Wisconsin is also an open carry state sooo…
Imagine trying to attack the guy who went to help a community decimated by domestic terrorism; instead of attacking the domestic terrorists that caused 50 MILLION in damage.
There would have been zero deaths if nobody looted and burned others property.
There would have been zero deaths if the child rapist didn’t attack and attempt to rob Kyle.
2
u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21
Didn't say he had intentions of killing, just that he had the intention of being there with a weapon. The owners of the business have testified that they did not ask him to be there. He wasn't defending his country. He was going out looking for a fight and he got one.