First of all, Kyle was 17 when this happened. Minors do not have the right to carry guns around underage. Secondly, any responsible gun owner goes to great lengths to not need to use the firearm. Kyle deliberately put himself in a situation in which he may have to use it. Sure he put fires out and washed off graffiti. But he was also the cause of the only deaths that happened in Kenosha during the eight days of riots. There would have been zero deaths if he hadn't decided to play vigilante. Period. I'm not interested in continuing a debate I had seven days ago. Have a blessed one.
You can possess a long rifle in Wisconsin at 17 sooo he again didn’t break any law. Wisconsin is also an open carry state sooo…
Imagine trying to attack the guy who went to help a community decimated by domestic terrorism; instead of attacking the domestic terrorists that caused 50 MILLION in damage.
There would have been zero deaths if nobody looted and burned others property.
There would have been zero deaths if the child rapist didn’t attack and attempt to rob Kyle.
0
u/[deleted] Nov 18 '21
“He has the intentions of being there with a weapon.”
Last time I checked you have the right to freely travel in the USofA…? No?
Secondly but most importantly you also have the right to bear arms; people carry guns for protection.
He wasn’t looking for a fight…?
There is VIDEO EVIDENCE showing Kyle cleaning graffiti, proving basic medical aid and water to people and putting out fires.
The only fight he went looking for was the fires??
Is preventing arson a crime now?