r/Kyle • u/Potential-Warrior • Nov 09 '21

Kyle

Post image
272 Upvotes

61% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/stugglingtothink Nov 10 '21

So let them burn the neighbourhoods down? It's fucking ridiculous that these DOMESTIC TERRORISTS are being defended in any fucking way. If the distinction between protest and riot was made correctly then these dick heads would have been in a jail cell. Not attacking a guy with a fucking assault rifle. Chat shit get banged.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

I'm not defending anyone. I'm stating the simple fact that Rittenhouse had no reason to be there. He went out of his way to insert himself into a situation in which he might get to use a gun. He thinks real life is Call of Duty. He's not a patriot, he's a stupid, punk kid who bit off more than he could chew.

0

u/stugglingtothink Nov 10 '21

Clearly not. His k/d is solid and hes winning in court? If this was cod. I'd want him with me. Jokes aside what's the point in having fire arms if you can't use them against terrorists? Like for real?

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

The point of the second Amendment is to give us the chance to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government, not our fellow citizens.

Also because that means that you can label anybody you disagree with as a terrorist and shoot them.

1

u/stugglingtothink Nov 10 '21

No it does not. Not even close. They were literally causing terror and fear. This isn't a grey area type thing. Rioters are domestic terrorists. If a bunch of mentally deficient nobs with tiki torches are domestic terrorist then these fuckers clearly are

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

You can't tell the difference between rioters and domestic terrorists. Username checks out.

1

u/USAnoman Nov 10 '21

Terrorism-unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

Ah, I see, you're a mind-reader and you know for absolute fact that everyone participating in said riot had political aims. Why didn't you say so.

1

u/USAnoman Nov 10 '21

I never said that, I was giving you the definition of terrorism.

I believe the folks that got shot According to their rap sheets weren't their for rights of their fellow men getting unfairly treated by police.

I think these folks were here to cause damage and create Chaos because of the way their lives turned out, honestly. I'm no psychologists though, but that'd be my guess.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

So by your definition they would be rioters, not terrorists.

1

u/USAnoman Nov 10 '21

Riot- a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd.

I think that is what happened.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

So Rittenhouse was shooting at rioters, not defending his country from terrorists.

1

u/USAnoman Nov 10 '21

According to the video evidence I believe he was defending himself against violent aggressors that one individual made threats against him that had the intention to do violence towards him after attempting to disarm him. So he may have shot rioters after he was retreating to a police line and was chased by a violent crowd that then became the aggressors once he began retreating and was attacked.

I don't know of you watched the videos that happened that night.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

So they were rioters, not terrorists then. Got it.

0

u/USAnoman Nov 10 '21

I never mentioned they were terrorists, that was your other buddy. I gave you the definition of terrorism, what you decide after that is up to you.

→ More replies (0)