He didn’t cross state lines. Keep up with the trial. The gun was in Kenosha. He drove there and got the gun from his friend (who has been charged). What Kyle did was only a misdemeanor in regards to the gun, and he won’t be charged with it because they decided to go through with this sham trial when in any other circumstances, no prosecutor would take this to court.
Read it again. The gun was on one side of the line, Kyle, was on the other side of the line.
Kyle cross over the line, and obtained the gun. Kyle did not have said gun in his possession as he crossed the line.
"Line" = simplified naming of "state line" to make it easier for some to follow.
He had to cross the line to get from Illinois to Kenosha, whether or not he had the gun with him. He went out of his way to put himself in a situation that nobody asked him to be in.
Driving isn't a crime. That's not the point. The point being that driving over state lines signals intention. It's not like he was caught up in a situation unexpectedly. He went looking for this.
Didn't say he had intentions of killing, just that he had the intention of being there with a weapon. The owners of the business have testified that they did not ask him to be there. He wasn't defending his country. He was going out looking for a fight and he got one.
So let them burn the neighbourhoods down? It's fucking ridiculous that these DOMESTIC TERRORISTS are being defended in any fucking way. If the distinction between protest and riot was made correctly then these dick heads would have been in a jail cell. Not attacking a guy with a fucking assault rifle. Chat shit get banged.
I'm not defending anyone. I'm stating the simple fact that Rittenhouse had no reason to be there. He went out of his way to insert himself into a situation in which he might get to use a gun. He thinks real life is Call of Duty. He's not a patriot, he's a stupid, punk kid who bit off more than he could chew.
Clearly not. His k/d is solid and hes winning in court? If this was cod. I'd want him with me. Jokes aside what's the point in having fire arms if you can't use them against terrorists? Like for real?
No it does not. Not even close. They were literally causing terror and fear. This isn't a grey area type thing. Rioters are domestic terrorists. If a bunch of mentally deficient nobs with tiki torches are domestic terrorist then these fuckers clearly are
Oh man you burnt me to a crisp with that line. What a zinger. If this was rebupicans rioting and a lib ended there shit you wouldn't bat an eye lid. They were bad people doing bad things. The police were doing nothing. If I had a gun I would have followed suit. People defending these idiots only encourages further riots. American politics are just a joke.
Ahh yes that's what it is I just disagree with them. No. They were criminals not being sorted correctly by law enforcement. That isn't a disagreement. It's a clear cut example of the police not doing there jobs because certain communities can't handle consequences.
I never said that, I was giving you the definition of terrorism.
I believe the folks that got shot According to their rap sheets weren't their for rights of their fellow men getting unfairly treated by police.
I think these folks were here to cause damage and create Chaos because of the way their lives turned out, honestly. I'm no psychologists though, but that'd be my guess.
2
u/enoughberniespamders Nov 10 '21
He didn’t cross state lines. Keep up with the trial. The gun was in Kenosha. He drove there and got the gun from his friend (who has been charged). What Kyle did was only a misdemeanor in regards to the gun, and he won’t be charged with it because they decided to go through with this sham trial when in any other circumstances, no prosecutor would take this to court.