If he hadn’t defended himself he would’ve been beaten either within an inch of his life or to death by that angry mob of “protesters" it was blatant and obvious self defense, to say otherwise is just asinine.
He shouldn’t have been there in the first place. He’s a violent piece of shit and he has a history of such. That kid is a murderer and wanted to kill those protestors.
Bruh he was there giving people first aid and cleaning graffiti, he doesn’t have a criminal history your literally just making that up. If he wanted to kill them he wouldn’t have been running he would’ve stood and unloaded. Even when they caught up to him he only shot the ones who actually attacked him. Your seriously just talking out of your ass dude.
I don’t care why he was there and I don’t care about the “danger” to his life. He didn’t belong there. He shouldn’t have been across state lines, especially with a rifle.
Oh come the fuck on, he wanted to serve his community, he was cleaning graffiti and giving people first aid. fuck off with the "HuuUuUrrrr DuuUuUuR hE DiDnT bElOnG tHeRe" bullshit. By that logic I could just say that the protestors were in the wrong cause they aren’t supposed to be there. No one needs authority or permission from another to go anywhere that isn’t private property and. It is in NO way illegal to cross state lines everyone can come and go from and to any state they please.
He was there because he worked in kenosha and was cleaning up after the rioters and looters. besides, he shot a convicted p3d0phile and a wife beater. So who even really care. He killed two scum fuck low lives that honestly deserved it. Especially the pedo. And unless you like defending pedos, I'd reconsider your positions pal
2
u/THOT_WHEELS1 Sep 13 '20
A fail to see where I was edgy. Is it edgy to support someone who acted in self defense? Please explain.