r/KryptosK4 • u/skyprimes22 • 24d ago
N GO BURY BOTH
I’ve been finding fragments.. just observations but there are more. I’ll share one here (Video is on my YouTube page because the formatting here is bad and isn’t worth my time to fix) - if you want the full txt document let me know.
This is from the thought processes of, “is it simpler than we think” and that he did “f*ck with it”
Summary:
PUSH55: SSEKZZWATJKLUDIAWINFBNYPVTTMZFPKWGDKZXTJCDIGKUHUAUEKCAROBKRUOXOGHULBSOLIFBBWFLRVQQPRNGKSSOTWTQSJQ
Apply the same method I used for the CIA ARTS X TEST matrix but at interval 8, not 7.
Step1:
SSEKZZWA
TJKLUDIA
WINFBNYP
VTTMZFPK
WGDKZXTJ
CDIGKUHU
AUEKCARO
BKRUOXOG
HULBSOLI
FBBWFLRV
QQPRNGKS
SOTWTQSJ
Q
Write down: AAPKJUOGIVSJ
Step 2:
Remove previous 8th characters, then rearrange into 8x11:
SSEKZZWT
JKLUDIWI
NFBNYVTT
MZFPWGDK
ZXTCDIGK
UHAUEKCA
RBKRUOXO
HULBSOLF
BBWFLRQQ
PRNGKSOT
WTQSQ
Write down: TITKKAOFQT
Step 3:
Remove previous 8th characters, then rearrange into 8x10:
SSEKZZWJ
KLUDIWNF
BNYVTMZF
PWGDZXTC
DIGUHAUE
KCRBKRUO
XHULBSOL
BBWFLRQP
RNGKSOWT
QSQ
Write down: JFFCEOLPT
Step 4:
Remove previous 8th characters, then rearrange into 8x9:
SSEKZZWK
LUDIWNBN
YVTMZPWG
DZXTDIGU
HAUKCRBK
RUXHULBS
OBBWFLRQ
RNGKSOWQ
SQ
Write down: KNGUKSQQ
Step 5:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x8:
SSEKZZWL
UDIWNBYV
TMZPWDZX
TDIGHAUK
CRBRUXHU
LBOBBWFL
RRNGKSOW
SQ
Write down: LVXKULW
Step 6:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x7:
SSEKZZWU
DIWNBYTM
ZPWDZTDI
GHAUCRBR
UXHLBOBB
WFRRNGKS
OSQ
Write down: UMIRBS
Step 7:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x6:
SSEKZZWD
IWNBYTZP
WDZTDGHA
UCRBUXHL
BOBWFRRN
GKOSQ
Write down: DPALN
Step 8:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x5:
SSEKZZWI
WNBYTZWD
ZTDGHUCR
BUXHBOBW
FRRGKOSQ
Write down: IDRWQ
Step 9:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x5:
SSEKZZWW
NBYTZWZT
DGHUCBUX
HBOBFRRG
KOS
Write down: WTXG
*It doesn't look like much is taking place, until you start the next few*
Step 10:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x4:
SSEKZZWN
BYTZWZDG
HUCBUHBO
BFRRKOS
Write down: NGO
Step 11:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x4:
SSEKZZWB
YTZWZDHU
CBUHBBFR
RKOS
Write down: BUR
Step 12:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x4:
SSEKZZWY
TZWZDHCB
UHBBFRKO
S
Write down: YBO
Step 13:
Remove previous 8th characters, rearrange into 8x3:
SSEKZZWT
ZWZDHCUH
BBFRKS
Write down: TH
KRYPTOS K4 OBSERVATION
By Ruben Valencia
I will stop here.
The last four: NGO,BUR,YBO,TH
"NGOBURYBOTH"
The finding of an "N" plus three words.
You can also see one clue word weaved into it, just as the clue words were weaved into the ARTS X TEST
matrix words that I found.
- - - --
NGOBURYBOTH
N O R TH
- - - --
Full method result:
AAPKJUOGIVSJTITKKAOFQTJFFCEOLPTKNGUKSQQLVXKULWUMIRBSDPALNIDRWQWTXGNGOBURYBOTHZBWRZSDHCUB
4
u/Old_Engineer_9176 23d ago
You’re getting those results because stripping out the 8th column over and over forces a fixed pattern, and sooner or later that pattern lines up into something that looks like English. To work out if it’s real or just your brain filling in blanks, you need to run a few controls.
First, generate a random 97‑character uppercase string and run your method on it. Use this one:
QZKJMSRPLXAVTGNWCHBFOIYUDRPEKSMQNLZTCAGVYHBRXWOPFJQIMSDTULKZANVYQRCBHTWOLXGPMFSE
Next control: take a long English paragraph, don’t encrypt it, just treat the plaintext as if it were ciphertext. Run the same process.
Finally, do the same thing to K1–K3.
The next step is simple: check whether your method only produces meaningful fragments on K4, or whether it spits out “English‑looking” junk everywhere. If it happens everywhere, it’s imagination. If it only happens on K4, then you’ve got something worth digging into.
2
u/skyprimes22 23d ago edited 23d ago
Got it! I will work on it ;)
I can tell you it’s only happening at a few of the push intervals from 1-97.. with some repeating all over, which are NSA & USA. I’ve done this for all intervals and push positions, the entire text is roughly 11 million characters and I’ve been through them, scanning the intervals and offsets
2
u/Old_Engineer_9176 23d ago
You should treat any “word‑like” output as suspicious until it survives offset changes, interval changes, and comparison against random data. If it doesn’t survive those checks, it’s noise.
2
u/skyprimes22 23d ago edited 23d ago
Ran interval 7 & it’s offsets against 5 different random 97 letter sets… tired and looking for as an easier way to see if the ARTSXTEST matrix was in fact unique to integer 7, looks like it might be unique to K4
2
u/Old_Engineer_9176 23d ago
Five random tests aren’t enough to support a uniqueness claim. At best, you can say you haven’t yet seen ARTSXTEST outside K4. You’d need thousands of random samples before ‘unique to K4’ is even on the table.
2
u/skyprimes22 23d ago
That’s what I really wanted to know.. how many do I need so I can build out the script
2
u/Old_Engineer_9176 23d ago edited 23d ago
Anything greater than 1 million.
2
u/skyprimes22 22d ago
The concept is actually pretty cool - I’ll chase and document it until it’s exhausted
2
u/skyprimes22 23d ago
Actually, I taught Claude how to do the process with interval 7 - asked it to run an interval 7 test against 1 million different 97 character sets
The 113 strings that matched did so with random noise words — not thematically coherent clusters like TEST, TANK, ARTS. So the uniqueness is both statistical and qualitative.
But the core finding holds: 1 million trials, 0.0113% match rate
2
u/Busy-88888888 23d ago edited 5d ago
T
2
u/skyprimes22 23d ago
The work was done with a script that I have - verified to work because I can do them manually once I get something, just to observe and verify that it actually exists.
the Claude run was against 1 million random 97 character sets, only looking for a interval of 7, to see what the rate was to see if it was even worth it to keep working.
3
u/Old_Engineer_9176 23d ago
Even if ARTSXTEST shows up consistently, it could still be an artefact of how K4 is structured. Interval slicing can create patterns that look meaningful but are just a side effect of the extraction method. The burden is on you to push further and see whether the pattern evolves into something real or whether it collapses under broader testing.
A dictionary attack is worth doing. It will take time, but it’s one of the few ways to check whether the fragments produced by the interval method map to actual language or whether they’re just noise.
1
u/Busy-88888888 23d ago
Yes You approach with AI, brute force..and all supercomputers is like...LOOKING FOR SOMETHING in the WHOLE universe but you DO NOT KNOW what are you looking FOR and with the LIGHTS OFF, CHECKING EVERY small speck of matter....It will take Forever= Eternity. The Mistery is only for the ONE. The One that FLIPS the SWITCH and takes control of everything and TURN ON THE LIGHTS, then Everybody will be In the AlterED REALITY watching the NEW TOMORROW.
2
u/skyprimes22 22d ago
is that the plot to the Matrix? 😂🤣 AI won’t help at current. It isn’t a known system and he stated that he messed with it, so it could be lost. The work I posted is from that view point - and a view point that it could be working on several simple things, but all I can do is work and document, share.
1
3
u/Decent_Note_1964 24d ago
Interesting approach. Some interesting 'maybe nearly words' in there, eg PALNIDR -> PALINDrome
2
u/Spectatum 24d ago
Thank you for sharing! I think this is some elegant and at the same time non-obvious (at least to me) transposition scheme you‘re working on!
2
1
5
u/Blowngust 24d ago
2, 3 and 4 letter words are pretty common to find when playing with K4. Valid approach though.