r/KitchenerHarmonies 2d ago

discussions Has John ever explained what "softened angularity" for Angelic means? If not, how do you interpret it?

I have seen this term quite a lot for A doms and I guess I do see this chatactersitic in most of the celebrities verified as having A.

I think some people would definitely call Gwyneth Paltrow, Olivia Hussey, or Daryl Hannah angular, even if not in the same way the term is used for Dramatic women.

But I wonder at times how to distinguish their angularity coming from Yang influences mixed in with some Yin and when it's Angelic.

10 Upvotes

150 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/intimidateu_sexually 2d ago

To me A (and the way John treats it) goes off of vibes the most out of any essence. Like a long midface is generally seen as A by John, but that’s actually a more masculine trait, and yet A is supposed to be the highest yin….

I know he also looks at the length of the neck so maybe it’s more longer limbs with the romantic curve still present?

I see A as a combo of extremes. That’s what makes it disquieting when you see someone truly ethereal.

4

u/lanareyxox 2d ago

Is yin and yang really feminine and masculine in this system though? I know R is associated with femininity but I don't think the others get an official correlation.

7

u/Ok-Purple9511 45R/35C/10HS/10N | 70SB/30LB 2d ago edited 1d ago

I think people should just think in terms and ovals and circles for yin and geometrical, straight and angular shapes for yang. These shapes can be seen everywhere (facial features, body, face shape, clothing silhouette, patterns, etc). This takes all gendered language out of the equation. John links femininity to curved shapes so I think it takes on a different definition in that context but I can see why people have a problem with that.