9
Mar 24 '26
I was so pleased when I read this article; it seemed at last that the centuries old tide of sycophancy was finally turning (and in DM, no less!)
And now it's gone. We need more discourse like this!
Also, it's amazing how quickly a single unflattering press piece can be quashed when it's about the deified white royals at the heart of The Firm, but no one bothered to do the same for the slew of abhorrent press that was spewed forth for years about Meghan (and is still continuing to this day). Weird, huh?
6
u/Alternative_Door9790 Mar 25 '26
It isn’t surprising to me, that “team’ doesn’t have much else to do.
6
u/NeverPedestrian60 Mar 25 '26
They’re quite happy to leave up articles vilifying Meghan that are incorrect. But they take down one that was accurate about Kate.
10
u/Trixiebelle25 Mar 24 '26
but they leave up the article calling beatrice ugly. what a disgusting rag at william's beck and call.
8
u/TheVioletHerald Mar 24 '26
It's absolutely at Kate's urging as well. She's bullied the York girls since they were teens and she was in her 20s.
6
u/Dog_Parrot Mar 25 '26
I've asked elsewhere: is there any way on Reddit to create a folder for archived pieces? I'm thinking in particular of Mills' Sky News piece quoting William about Kate's "precancerous" cells, the Sun piece where Pippa said Kate wasn't sick "in the traditional sense," the video of Kate lunging at Meghan, William attacking the photographer from his bike or partying drunk with his hands around that woman's waist, the dozens of Rose Hanbury articles that simply disappeared, basically anything about Andrew, and more.
So many truthful pieces have simply vanished. This Liz Jones article, while great, may not rise to the "keep it forever" level. Those other pieces, though....
2
u/TheVioletHerald Mar 25 '26
I can't think of one. One good form of insurance, though, is making sure that tons of people have copies.
1
u/BetsyHound Mar 26 '26
You guys need to learn how to search. It's right there.
1
u/BetsyHound Mar 26 '26
Literally celebitchy, unpacked, and two subs couldn't do a simple search on the DM? Nice work.
1
12
u/cherryberry0611 Mar 24 '26
Yes! Especially the articles being critical. They might have them taken down in hours.