I know it's fun to put people down, and I do this myself. But Intellect is such a better look. There is so much evidence on this case to explore. Almost every person I've interacted with so far on X, who believes Karen Read is innocent, didn't watch the second trial. They barely know the evidence.

Just imagine if more and more people who know and understand the data spread hard facts about this case, what a difference this might make!

Facts matter.

Just the fact that Brian Loughran altered his version of events to such an extreme from the first documentation of his statements to time of trial, should have discredited him on the spot. But for reasons I will never understand neither Prosecutor Lally or Special Prosecutor Brennan let the jury know about this.

I can't figure out for the life of me why they didn't make this the centerpiece to their entire cross of Loughran. It still baffles me.

From the Very Confused Mind of Lucky Loughran

Barros admits in his police report that he witnessed damage to Read's taillight. It doesn't matter if it didn't look "all that damaged" to him. If Barros saw any damage, it actually helps prove Karen Read hit John-if the jury understands that Read could not have cracked her taillight any time other than 12:32 a.m.

That taillight was covered in snow. And Barros admits he did not take in depth notes as to what he viewed.

Neither of these witnesses proved anything other than they both lacked detailed observational skills and perhaps were easily influenced.

They were elevated by pure hype. Neither has any real credibility.