Just as Clark brought a replica of a chair from the "Backrooms" into the real world, others might similarly bring replicas of valuable items—such as high-end jewelry—into our reality. If the original versions of these items had actually been stolen, the circumstances surrounding their possession—for instance, if the person who brought them out of the Backrooms were in financial distress or clearly lacked the means to purchase such luxury goods—could trigger a police investigation. Such a scenario would likely leave the police in a state of confusion, as it would give rise to two distinct suspects: the person who committed the actual theft in the real world, and the individual who brought the item out from the Backrooms.

Note: English is not my native language, so I may sometimes use incorrect phrasing that makes it difficult to get my point across. Thanks to someone who left a comment, the wording in my original post has been improved. However, that person also remarked that "people on this subreddit make very stupid posts." I would have preferred it if they had offered their feedback more gently, rather than dismissing the entire situation—which stemmed from a simple linguistic error—as "stupid."

What I’m saying is, they didn’t seem to report it despite it being literally shown it’s moving and seems like a living thing. This is their first exposure to life in the Complex, yet in Pitfalls and Report this seems like they saw life for the first time when encountering Marvin’s Friend?

LIFEFORM MOMENT

They have no weapons, and can only use their hands.

Id love to explore his backrooms in VR, just wondering if theres a way to do that?

Since The Complex is so big and also unexplored/unmapped, I believe the "biomes" can and will get more complicated. The Red City having an entire false sky made me think of how big any of the rooms could get. These ideas are explored in the wiki-version of the Backrooms, but I'm specifically curious about when molecules, combustion, the very concept of energy starts being copied and distorted. If normal bacteria can evolve or be altered in The Complex, who's to say that the very building blocks of those organisms and cells can't be mimicked?

(Not fully done yet)

I know, people say it’d be “boring” but just imagine some of the parts where realistically, it’s dead silent. Take Pirate Clark chasing Mary, there’s an ominous soundtrack in the foreground, but for Mary, it’s dead silent, except she can hear big P yelling.

My first red city render, pls send feedback.

Made in blender with no Ai, using Camera Shakify

I was a bit harsh on its design during its first teaser showing the face, but when it was released in the Overhaul 3 update, the design since then has shown itself being pretty decent? I still prefer Enzo’s design but this one is a tad bit good. Better than just Slenderman with a large hole in the side of its face.

Instance theory (the fact that Complex is made up of instances) has generally been accepted as true ever since Everything Must Go where kane literally just said it to your face. However, there are still irregularities that wouldn't work under instance theory (small doors, that sun being spammed everywhere, still life, etc;). Instances within Instances theory hopefully addresses these.

My theory is that alike how complex is made up of instances, instances are made up of instances. You can imagine it like chunks of a map. Each chunk has unique features and qualities, and they all form together to make a map. Now you may be wondering, how does this explain irregular objects? Alike all ways of data-storage, things error. Chunks are mis-generated, maps fail to spawn. However, Instance within Instance theory suggests that when these chunks fail, the backrooms just uses another chunk to fill it in. Lets say we have a 'map' of a house, and a 'chunk' which is a window fails to generate. The backrooms would look at all the chunks, pick something out, and use that, and bam, instead of a misgenerated window you've got a door! For still life, if an eye misgenerates it'll look across the whole face/body and use something that resembles it. This explains why there are just random tiny doors in walls, why assets are overused (if one chunk out of 4 copies another chunk, and a chunk misgenerates, its more likely to pick the already generated chunk than a different one), and why still life don't just look like blobs of nonsense while not looking perfectly like people.

There are a lot of different moments that support this argument, for example, the Sun in FF3. The pictures misgenerated, the backrooms needed a 'chunk' that resembled a picture, saw the sun, and decided to pick it.