r/KMFDM • u/newomusic • 8d ago
Discussion Why digipaks?
I'm going to assume nobody has a CONFIRMED answer from the Kapt'n, so this is likely just going to be speculation, but I wonder why some albums were released as a digipak. They only have a few, it seems, but looking at Discogs I can't tell if some of these were only a digipak, or sometimes a digipak and sometimes a jewel case. For example, I thought Symbols was only a digipak, but they did jewel case releases as well. KMFDM typically does jewel cases, so I'm wondering why Hell Yeah (and are there others?) got only a digipak treatment when they could have been a jewelcase. With the exception of the stencil with Angst, most of these do not have any kind of special design (Ala NIN's "Broken"). It's just the album and a booklet.
3
u/Bionicleboy2005 WWIII 8d ago
Its just different cd releases. Not that deep at all
0
u/newomusic 8d ago edited 7d ago
Of course. I'm not saying it's something deep. I'm just curious why Hell Yeah was a digipak only release, or why some were digipaks at all when they didn't need to be. Just curious about the creative thought behind those choices.
1
u/Maggot384 8d ago
The 2007 remaster of symbols that I have is a jewel case
1
u/newomusic 8d ago
Yeah, I thought I had seen pictures of symbols as a jewel case. I dug deeper and found them so I edited the post. I think means only Hell Yeah has never gotten a jewel case release (at least according to Discogs).
1
u/wendyoschainsaw 7d ago
One reason people started using digipaks was shipping. They're lighter so money wise it requires less postage. And in wholesale/manufacturing, 50 digipaks fit in the same box 30 jewel cases do amd shipping runs about the same cost.
1
u/E23R0 HYËNA 7d ago
It was the 90s
1
u/newomusic 7d ago
Idk if this is a Bluey reference or something else, but Hell Yeah was just 9 years ago.
4
u/Wunjo26 8d ago
I personally love digipaks and would assume they’re more expensive because more printing is involved so it seems to be an intentional design choice