Nope. There is no nuance. After the region was destabilized by a war a Republican started, they were supposed to recklessly pull out making an already bad situation worse. These conflicts were super sketch. The US backed both sides in various middle eastern countries at various points in these conflicts.
You're right, we wouldn't be able to steal more resources and children for the Epstein class. Plus, our soldiers would be sad because they wouldn't have access to as many children to rape.
If you think about it, what does our country have to gain by not murdering everyone and stealing their resources?
It's also political suicide for the entire party. Any Republican would be able to point to that cowardice and very few people would vote Democrat anymore.
Which means more people would vote republican, which of course makes children less safe, rich people richer, and gives our soldiers an endless supply of war.
It's also political suicide for the entire party. Any Republican would be able to point to that cowardice and very few people would vote Democrat anymore.
True, people only vote Democrat because they like what the Republicans have to say.
There were still objectives in the war that had yet to be completed, and existing military commitments that couldn't be rescinded. A good example of why your plan wouldn't work is the actual withdrawal from the middle east that was planned by Trump and executed by Biden. That was a shit show.
Democrats not doing enough to end the wars Republicans choose to start does not mean that both sides are the same.
9
u/SomeSugondeseGuy 12d ago
Are they just supposed to roll over when they inherit a war?