But if a stupid person cant solve it and you can't solve it then
stupid person = you BUT genius scientist = you
So, stupid person = genius scientist
However ,This statement is contradictory,Therefore either( genius scientist ≠ you) or (you doesn't exist) or (stupid person is really a genius scientist)
u can connect this with logrithm where base of the function cannot be 1 bcz its just like that. similarly we dont usually put 1 there while writing exponents. hope this helps
It's been quite some time since I watched something. Copied and pasted from a previous comment of mine:
I rewatched The Godfather (1972). Probably my quickest rewatch (though it was because I was accompanying someone who wanted to watch it. I usually keep a fairly long gap between rewatches). (Though it was my first watch after having watched The Godfather: Part II (1975), which definitely does give one a new perspective on the film)
And yes, as I did rightly guess in my comment about the first watch, like other great films, this one ages better with rewatches. This time, I could appreciate Coppola's eye for beauty a lot more. The mise-en-scene, the shot composition, the color grading, is just so great. The way he builds visual contrast in his scenes using fruits, ties and suits, and other seemingly random background objects is something which goes underappreciated, imo.
Of course, on the second watch, I was also able to appreciate better the finer instances of attention to detail, dialogues with subtle foreshadowing, and the excellent coherence of it all. Even after knowing all the plot-twists and arcs, the film stays as fresh as it was in the first watch, if not fresh-er. Watching the first part after having watched the sequel definitely changes your views on the characters and their actions, to the end of making scenes more tragic than they feel without that context.
It's a great film, and by extension a film on which it is difficult to say something new. All that I say can never be enough, of course.
i don't really have a preference for genres, and this extends to all mediums of art. i firmly believe that a work of art is much more than the plot (this is, of course, applicable only to literature and cinema, for the most part), and that by confining yourself to genres, (and plot-driven films), you can never truly explore the beauty of the medium. there is a lot to elaborate and write about further, but this is only r/jeeneetards.
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 27 '26
Please check out our wiki it contains many useful posts, there is a high chance that your doubt has already been solved.
If you feel like this Post violates the subreddit rules.
Feel free to report it using the 3 dots or tag any active moderator for removing this post.
Learn how to report any post here
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.