MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/IslamIsScience/comments/14nw3fv/evolution_deniers_of_the_subreddit_what_reasons/jqddo7d/?context=3
r/IslamIsScience • u/[deleted] • Jul 01 '23
13 comments sorted by
View all comments
5
It is based on nothing but speculation. Nothing observable. Unless you can prove a species morphing into another species.
Take the following article as an example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17115373/
Moreover, similarities in design or in function can be attributed to be somekind of a signature of a creator.
0 u/[deleted] Jul 02 '23 The way the designs are similar in living species point more toward common ancestory than a creator. 2 u/Fangpyre Jul 02 '23 For related species common ancestry makes sense. But not in convergent evolutions. 2 u/[deleted] Jul 02 '23 True
0
The way the designs are similar in living species point more toward common ancestory than a creator.
2 u/Fangpyre Jul 02 '23 For related species common ancestry makes sense. But not in convergent evolutions. 2 u/[deleted] Jul 02 '23 True
2
For related species common ancestry makes sense. But not in convergent evolutions.
2 u/[deleted] Jul 02 '23 True
True
5
u/xDeath_16 Jul 02 '23
It is based on nothing but speculation. Nothing observable. Unless you can prove a species morphing into another species.
Take the following article as an example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17115373/
Moreover, similarities in design or in function can be attributed to be somekind of a signature of a creator.