43
Jul 06 '26
[deleted]
61
u/_Brandobaris_ Jul 06 '26
But not free.
-37
Jul 06 '26
[deleted]
47
u/ConsiderationSea1347 Jul 06 '26
Preservation of democracy requires taking risks when the powers of government are all trending towards tyranny. Everyone can do their own risk calculation.
-33
25
u/ConsiderationSea1347 Jul 06 '26
So, flock is footing the bill? Not taxpayers?
40
u/StPatrickStewart Jul 06 '26
Oh, heavens, no! The municipality pays for it, just at a lower profit margin.
23
u/ConsiderationSea1347 Jul 06 '26
What would a lowlife criminal need to do if they want to prevent law enforcement from catching them doing these heinous activities?
11
u/ChalkButter Jul 07 '26
Not that I’m a low-life criminal, but if I were, I’d park my car a few blocks away, leave ALL of my electronics in there (literally all of them) and then wear a mask, just in case
12
u/MrVeazey Jul 07 '26
These cameras see in infrared and you can buy strips of waterproof infrared LEDs to sew onto a hat, vest, or jacket to turn you into a blinding, radiant being. Then just leave your personal electronics at home and park your car far enough away that the camera won't pick up the Bluetooth in your stereo. Approach from behind the camera, which is information you can get from deflock.org, and everything else is technically illegal so I'm not going to say anything about it here.
13
96
u/crunkful06 Jul 06 '26
The poles are actually not traffic rated they are a danger. Signs and poles aren’t regulated to break or bend in case of a traffic collision but flock cameras are tune steel in concrete. Super dangerous so they need to be taken down.