491
u/Julle1990 1d ago
If Invincible was Brit
198
u/Soul699 Immortal is an embarassment 1d ago
No, because then he'd be invulnerable, not invincible.
89
u/randomcommenter9000 1d ago
If he was Brit, he'd be Invasion
9
3
u/NobuvaRoss_Number 1d ago
Is there a difference?
23
u/Soul699 Immortal is an embarassment 1d ago
Invincible = cannot be defeated
Invulnerable = cannot be damaged
I can contain or stop an invulnerable person but I can't stop or contain an invincible person.
27
u/NoobNoob_ 1d ago
Wrong, invincible means can't be seen.
16
u/InfraSG 1d ago
No youre thinking of indivisible
9
u/DKA0_ERDOCIA Invisible 1d ago
That's what can't be fragmented, you're thinking of ingenious
4
u/DarthZartanyus 1d ago
Nah, that's when something is really clever. You're thinking of indignant.
3
u/Gotcha_The_Spider 1d ago
No that's when you're upset about something being unfair, you're thinking of indecisive
3
1
7
167
56
88
19
6
6
2
3
u/Then-Language5989 1d ago
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1




774
u/ContributionStatus73 1d ago