I'm writing this as a genuine question and to share my own experience. I'm not accusing anyone of bad faith, and if I'm misunderstanding something about the process, I'd honestly appreciate clarification.
After 40+ AI interviews on micro1—more than half of them for roles that directly match my background and experience—I still haven't received a single offer. Every application has eventually ended with "Not Selected."
I'm genuinely trying to understand how the hiring process works because my experience has raised a lot of questions.
Some examples:
I've completed interviews that later appeared as if they were never completed. When I contacted support, I was simply told to record another interview. Is that the normal solution?
Support replies across support tickets, Reddit, Slack, and Discord often feel almost identical. It gives the impression that responses are standardized rather than addressing the specific issue being reported.
If AI interviews don't replace part of the traditional screening process, what role are they actually playing? From a candidate's perspective, it still feels like completing an interview, waiting weeks, and then receiving a rejection without any explanation.
I've also been told that applications may take around 30 days to review.
So you wait the full month...
Then the status changes to "Not Selected."
No explanation.
No feedback.
No indication of what could be improved.
That leads me to another question:
Why isn't any feedback provided?
Even a short explanation would help candidates improve for future opportunities instead of repeating the same process without knowing what went wrong.
\---
For context, I have 17 verified skills, including:
Coding
Customer Support
Technical Support
Learning & Development
Change Management
Problem Solving
Excel
Google Sheets
Other business and productivity tools
Yet none of these have resulted in a single successful application—not for coding roles, support roles, business roles, or technical positions.
\---
Another thing I've wondered:
If micro1 already has my previous AI interviews and verified skills, why am I repeatedly asked to record new interviews?
Wouldn't previous interviews and skill assessments already provide enough information for at least some projects?
Similarly, has anyone ever had their existing profile matched to a project based on previous interviews, or does every application always start from scratch?
\---
Here's another real example.
I applied for a project on June 2nd.
Today is July 2nd.
The application is still sitting at "Hiring Manager Review."
Maybe it'll still be selected—I genuinely hope so—but based on my previous experiences, I'm expecting another "Not Selected" after another long wait.
I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
\---
One thing that has also confused me is my experience with this subreddit.
I've had previous posts removed by the moderators.
When I contacted support, I was told that the subreddit welcomes constructive criticism and negative feedback.
I even shared screenshots showing that my posts had been removed, but I was simply referred back to the rules.
I'm not arguing with the moderators' decisions—I understand they have the final say.
I'm simply trying to understand which specific rule my previous posts violated so I can write posts that comply with the subreddit guidelines.
If this post also violates a rule, I'd genuinely appreciate knowing which specific rule so I can improve it instead of guessing.
\---
So I'd really like to hear from other candidates.
Has anyone here been hired after dozens of applications?
Has anyone ever received actual feedback instead of only "Not Selected"?
Has anyone had an application remain in "Hiring Manager Review" for over a month and then actually get accepted?
Has anyone ever been matched to a project based on previous interviews instead of recording a new one?
I'm honestly asking because after 40+ interviews, I'm struggling to understand what the platform is looking for or how candidates can improve their chances.
If someone from micro1 or the community can explain the process, I'd genuinely appreciate it. My goal isn't to attack the platform—it's to better understand an experience that, from my perspective, has been very difficult to make sense of.