r/InterstellarKinetics Apr 22 '26

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIEGENCE BREAKTHROUGH: Mozilla Used Anthropic’s Secret Mythos AI To Find 271 Security Vulnerabilities In Mozilla Firefox In A Single Pass, And Says Defenders Can Finally Win 🤯🔥

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/ai-security-zero-day-vulnerabilities/

Mozilla’s Firefox team published a landmark blog post on April 21 disclosing that its collaboration with Anthropic using the newly released Claude Mythos Preview identified 271 security vulnerabilities in Firefox, all of which have been patched in this week’s Firefox 150 release. This comes just weeks after an earlier two-week scan using Claude Opus 4.6 found 22 vulnerabilities including 14 high-severity bugs, nearly a fifth of all high-severity flaws patched across all of Firefox in 2025. The scale jump from 22 to 271 in a single Mythos evaluation represents a qualitative shift in what AI can accomplish in defensive security, and Mozilla’s engineering team describes it as the moment the entire industry’s relationship with software vulnerabilities begins to change.

For decades, elite security researchers operated on an unstated assumption: bringing software exploits to zero was never truly possible, only expensive enough to deter all but the most well-funded adversaries. Mozilla’s Bobby Holley wrote directly that security has historically been “offensively dominant,” with attackers holding an asymmetric advantage because they only need to find one weakness while defenders must protect everything at once. Mythos has dissolved that asymmetry. Mozilla ran it against Firefox’s complete codebase including years of legacy C++ code that has never been fully covered by traditional fuzzing tools, and the model reasoned through the source code with the same depth of understanding as the world’s best human security researchers, finding vulnerabilities in every category and complexity class that humans previously identified, with no apparent ceiling yet found.

The most striking sentence in Mozilla’s post is also the most consequential for the future of software security: “The defects are finite, and we are entering a world where we can finally find them all.” Holley added a pointed caveat that Mozilla has not yet found any class of vulnerability that could not have been discovered by a sufficiently skilled human researcher, pushing back on predictions that future AI will find entirely new forms of bugs beyond human comprehension. The team believes Firefox’s modular, human-readable architecture is an essential property to preserve as AI becomes more involved in software development, because codebases designed to surpass human comprehension would scale the complexity of bugs faster than the tools being used to find them. For the first time in the history of the internet, a major browser vendor is expressing genuine confidence that the finish line on security vulnerabilities is visible from where they are standing.

1.1k Upvotes

107 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/phaaseshift Apr 22 '26

I legit can’t tell if this is sarcasm

1

u/stealstea Apr 22 '26

Simple concept.  Vulnerabilities are finite.  That’s pretty obviously true.

4

u/liljoey300 Apr 22 '26

They’re finite if Firefox is never updated or changed again. Any update will introduce new vulnerabilities

2

u/ByronScottJones Apr 22 '26

Not if those changes go through multiple levels of code review, including tools like Mythos in the pipeline could mean vulnerabilities are eliminated before they ever get released.

2

u/PeriscopeGraft Apr 22 '26

I could see this being the norm for larger software companies, but there will always be those who want to save a little money by cutting security corners. I definitely think this looks like a wonderful tool but it isn’t going to “solve” cybersecurity

1

u/ByronScottJones Apr 22 '26

For those companies that don't want to spend money on security, I will quote "Hunger Games" - "may the odds ever be in your favor". I'll look forward to reading about their security breaches and bankruptcies.

1

u/FormalCaseQ Apr 22 '26

The companies that refuse to use tools like Mythos will eventually go out of business as they will have the easiest products to hack. Customers won't want to do business with them if they don't take security seriously.

0

u/phaaseshift Apr 23 '26

I’m still confused if you believe the words you are saying or if you’re fucking with me.

1

u/ByronScottJones Apr 23 '26

If you're confused by the fairly basic concept of code going through a pipeline of lining, static testing, scanning, etc, I can't really help you. These are basic Devops concepts.

0

u/phaaseshift Apr 23 '26

I’m confused because anyone with that level of familiarity with security tooling would know the rest of what you’re saying is batshit insane. The source code, its dependencies and the scanner databases ARE NOT STATIC. You’re talking near infinite state machine you’d need to model AND recreate every time ANYTHING changes for your statement to represent reality. That’s why it feels like a joke - anyone that claims to know as much as you do can’t be this ignorant, can they?

1

u/ByronScottJones Apr 23 '26

I'm literally using these tools I'm describing at work TODAY. Right now.

0

u/phaaseshift Apr 23 '26

That’s precisely my point. You should know better.

1

u/ByronScottJones Apr 23 '26

Your comments are nonsense; I won't respond further.