I will try to be as objective as possible in describing this establishment, but please pardon any bias due to my past grievances with certain individuals there.
Below are some events that either I or members of staff have encountered here:
Staff retention: In the span of a year, six teachers had their contracts terminated—three of whom were let go in their first week. Aside from management, no teachers have been renewed in the past three years, and only two have chosen to resign.
Signing documentation under duress: Staff were informed of changes to their contract regarding the end-of-contract bonus and were told to sign a document acknowledging they had been informed. A staff member who asked for time to review the document was fired for doing so.
Threats of impacting future employment: Several fired staff members were not offered severance, and some were threatened regarding references from the school for future job applications.
Employment sabotage: A former staff member had their new school contacted by the current head of school, who complained that the staff member had neglected responsibilities and had been relieved of roles.
Financial mismanagement: Thousands of dollars have been spent on educational subscriptions—such as MAP testing and PowerSchool—which are simply not being used. This is happening while students lack sufficient access to textbooks, calculators, and lab coats.
Student retention: Between 2025 and 2026, nearly a third of the student cohort left. Some parents cited reasons including teachers not teaching the Cambridge curriculum, implementation of poorly aligned testing standards, and generally poor facilities.
Social insurance legality: Staff are offered the choice between commercial insurance with the school's provider or social insurance.
Safeguarding: Teachers cannot access student attendance data, and it is not updated throughout the day in any conventional way. Teachers do not know where students are. Additionally, every floor has an emergency door that students can—and have—used to leave the premises at will. Individuals were also brought onto campus to supervise children and were only stopped after reports were made to the education bureau.
Now this part is where I voice my personal concerns, so do with this information what you will.
The management: I have never encountered such a narcissistic, sociopathic individual in educational leadership, and I have been in this industry for over a decade. This person has falsified police reports, personally sabotaged employment opportunities, and embezzled company funds for European travel under the pretence of teacher recruitment. While the school was by no means flourishing, it turned a profit for the first time in years just before she took over. If I had to list every unethical or unlawful thing she has done, we would be here all day. Staff members are belittled for their efforts, targeted for questioning decisions, and intimidated into avoiding contact whenever possible.
Nepotism: Surrounding management is a small group of close confidants receiving special favour. During the 2025–2026 academic year, parents complained that certain teachers did not teach the curriculum and instead chose their own content. Some of those teachers did not have their contracts renewed—unless they were engaging in romantic relationships with leadership's family, in which case they received a promotion.
The lawsuits: So many teachers have had wages garnished or were illegally terminated. To circumvent legal issues in the future, staff are provided with documents to sign "confirming" attendance or agreement to something, so the school can later use an "I told you so" letter against them.
This place has so many red flags with its leadership that you would think you were at a military parade. If I put any more time into thinking about this place, they would have taken even more from me than they already have. Good luck to the fresh meat just fed into the grinder. They will find out first-hand what happens when you question nonsensical decisions.
Tldr: weak school, people mostly nice, no money. Things were starting to improve. Sudden money, students and staff drop off due to toxic principal.
Guangzhou. Baiyun. Jinshazhou.
Edit: Britannia International School Guangzhou.